12/29/11
Sherlock
Holmes: A Game Of Shadows - wasn't thrilled by the first one, but
figured i'd give this one a shot. well, i won't repeat that mistake again.
it's heavy on unintelligible plot and not much else. there's potential
in this franchise, but they need to get different writers and a good editor
for the next go round. if it's under 115 minutes then i'll give it a shot.
C-.
Adventures
Of Tin Tin - pretty solid animated spielberg film. it's spielberg's
first 3d or animated film and i found it to be very spielbergian and a
good use of the format. we didn't watch it in 3d, but i can definitely
see how it would translate, though probably not as well as scorsese's hugo
did. it's basically a cross between indiana jones and the encyclopedia
brown books which i used to love as a kid. andy serkis does a good job
as a drunken captain. other than that the voice performances weren't all
that notable. runs long. B.
12/27/11
Twilight:
Breaking Dawn: Part 1 - this is seriously one of the worst films
of all-time. the twilight series is basically the godfather (original two
only) or star wars (original three only) of bad film series. the film you're
watching at the time is the one that is the worst of all-time. there's
basically nothing redeeming or interesting about this film, unless we're
talking about the sociology of twilight fans. when bella is giving birth
to her baby it might be the most unpleasant movie watching experience i've
had in a movie theater. F-.
Bee
Movie - after finishing the disney
marathon i decided i should take on dreamworks and pixar films. i had
seen this film before and we owned it so it was a convenient place to start.
the writing and animation are really good and jerry seinfeld really rounds
the film out nicely. renee zellweger's voice work is less impressive and
actually detracted from the film a bit. i'm not sure if it's her voice
or the fact that it just didn't seem to go along with the animated character
she was voicing. plot-wise the film is cute because it looks at a valuable
and overlooked part of the world (honeybees) and imagines how they might
feel or live. it's a topic that is perfectly suited to animation. B+.
12/25/11
Bad
Santa - pretty reliable winter comedy. A-.
Hesher
- the year's best film even though imdb has it as having been officially
released last year. the cast is uniformly excellent and it floats between
drama and comedy effortlessly. strictly speaking i'd say it's a comedy
and it has plenty of good laughs, but it also has a heart that is believable.
joseph gordon-levitt has a knack for picking good scripts and this may
be his best find to date. unfortunately for everyone, the film didn't make
very much money so i'm not so sure we'll see another susser film anytime
soon. A-.
Last
Frontier - unexceptional anthony mann western that never really
grabbed my attention. ended up working on cabinet design instead of watching
it very closely. C.
12/23/11
Fantasia
2000 - not as good as the original, but it has some of the original
pieces in it, but with a better quality picture. the original idea was
that fantasia would be updated every few years, but it took them 60 years
to
do it. there's nothing like the original, which also gets points for being
so ahead of its time. this one is good, but unnecessary. this was the last
film i needed to watch to complete the disney feature animated film marathon.
here's
a recap. B-.
12/21/11
Shame
- this film leaves a lasting impression, for better or worse. i think it's
a good film and a successful one. it's another quality film about mental
illness (other recents include: it's kind of a funny story, take shelter
(?), martha marcy may marlene). in this case the mental illness is addiction
to sex. fassbender is really good in the lead role. the star, though, is
the style and tone of the film. steve mcqueen (no relation) does a really
good job with the flow and tenor of the picture. it's occasionally obnoxious
(like the achingly slow carey mulligan version of new york new york), but
it mostly builds into the film the idea that we're just witnessing everything
that is happening. there's not a lot of artifice to the film. there are
some nice shots, but i didn't feel like mcqueen was trying to draw attention
to the direction, per se. the music fit right into this as well of course
and, after i saw it in full, seeing bits later on instantly recalled the
feelings i had when watching it the first time. it's a good and effective
film about an addiction that i'm guessing we're going to see more and more
of in the next few generations. B+.
12/18/11
Dinosaur
- the animation on this one was distractingly bad. they went with the computer
generated stuff here and tried to make it look as realistic as possible,
but it just wasn't working for me. they used live-action backgrounds which
is a nice idea, unfortunately it didn't work very well. none of the characters
here did much for me and the plot wasn't exciting enough to make up for
it. one of the worst disney pictures in my opinion. C-.
Bad
Teacher - still funny after the second viewing. diaz is really
good and the script is snarky and funny and never sells out. B+.
12/17/11
Young
Adult - diablo cody is one of the best writers in hollywood today.
she's funny and edgy, she has a voice of her own, and she just has a knack
for writing well. in 5 minutes you knew exactly who charlize theron's character
was and what she was all about. later in the film she gets some greater
depth that adds to the character and then, in the end, she comes full circle
and there's no joy in mudville; as should be the case. that probably doesn't
make any sense unless you've see the film, so go watch it. oswalt and theron
are really good together and the reitman's direction takes cody's baton
and runs with it, just as it did in juno. B+.
12/16/11
Hugo-
it's embarrassing how much better the 3d is in this movie when compared
to avatar. for the first 15 minutes or so it's like scorsese is showing
off and basically stating "i'm the best filmmaker in the world right now
- i can make 3d movies better than anyone, i can make kids' movies better
than anyone, and here's proof." beyond the beautiful visuals and use of
3d, the film is a nice little story and a homage to early film. it's scorsese
the film lover. it's the scorsese we know from his interviews wherein he
espouses his love of the cinema. maybe a little slow at times, but it has
a nice balance and is better than anything else i've seen in 3d. B+.
New
Year's Eve - a pretty awful film. valentine's day was better, not
that that's saying much. merely a star vehicle. there's one semi-interesting
plotline with deniro as an old dying man. other than that it's just a bunch
of good looking stars cashing in. it also has sarah jessica parker in it
and they seem to think she's still 30 years old. F+.
Emperor's
New Groove - i liked david spade's voice work here and it's a nice
enough story about an emperor finding some humility after being changed
into a llama by the film's villain. not one of the strongest disney pictures,
but i liked it more than tangled which seemed well-reviewed. B-.
12/12/11
Bridesmaids
- a little better than i remember it being the first time around. i don't
watch snl anymore so i didn't know about kristen wiig until she was in
knocked up, but i love her cameo there and have been a fan since then.
here she proves that she can carry the lead position in comedic films to
come. i also love rose byrne's ability to do different roles so effectively.
B+.
12/11/11
Many
Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh - not as good as i remember
it being. pooh is actually somewhat annoying at times because of his inefficiency
and single-mindedness. maybe that's a sign that i'm getting to be an old
curmudgeon. C+.
12/09/11
My
Week With Marilyn - starts out well enough and michelle williams
does a decent job of capturing some of the mannerisms of monroe, but doesn't
totally sell it in the end. i'm not a huge fan of monroe, but she does
have something that set her apart on film. that said, it would appear that
she was a bear to work with, and she was far from a genius as an actress
so i have to conclude that she was more trouble than she was worth. honestly,
whether it's steve jobs or marilyn monroe, i'm pretty much over the idea
that so-called genius gets a pass in our society. you need to work well
with others regardless of your ability as a supposed innovator or actress
or football player for that matter. C+.
Sitter
- funny jonah hill pic. he carries the comic weight of the film and does
it well. the supporting cast fills in nicely here and there, but it's really
about hill. the little girl is cute and funny and up there with chloe moretz.
i guess david gordon green is officially a comedy director at this point.
never would have guessed that 10 years ago. i'd watch it again. B+.
12/08/11
Man
Nobody Knew: In Search Of My Father, CIA Spymaster William Colby
- documentary about william colby former cia director and operative who
was working during vietnam and started his service career during ww2. somewhere
buried in here there is a good documentary. god knows that the content
and subject matter are interesting enough. unfortunately it's barely personal
and not particularly good as a history lesson either. it's directed by
colby's son and he provides a lot of background info and context, but it's
so haphazard and unorganized that a narrative barely emerges. it would
have been more interesting if he focused on the sacrifice his father made
as a family man in order to be a cia man, unfortunately there's not much
of that. when there is, though, the film gets more interesting. C.
12/07/11
J.
Edgar - another film that has some potential that is unfulfilled.
pretty much across the board this film fails to succeed like it could have.
dustin lance black writes another story about a gay man in political service.
milk was a pretty good story and movie, j. edgar, not so much. his agenda,
it seems, is to expose america to historical gay figures in a light that
shows they're just like everyone else. he accomplished that in both milk
and j. edgar, but failed to provide much in the way of interesting narrative
here. he's an ex-mormon gay guy so his filmography (milk, j. edgar and
big love) makes perfect sense to date.
leo is usually quite
reliable, but here he falls flat. naomi watts is decent in a supporting
role as is judi dench. armey hammer is quite bad. eastwood is a capable
director of course, but it seems like he slept-walked through this one.
it's shot well enough and has some grit to it, but there's just no bite
or anything new to say here. it's another conservative political type with
mommy issues and there wasn't any life given to it by anyone involved.
C.
12/06/11
Paradise
Lost 2: Revelations - this follow-up documentary to the 1996 film
comes 4 years later and (mostly) follows the people who are trying to free
the west memphis 3. a lawyer and his new expert witness as well as a group
of people who found out about the trial from the first film and have gone
about trying to get a retrial. it also follows the stepdad (john byers)
of one of the victims. he was accused of potentially being part of the
murder, but none of the claims stuck. 4 years later his wife is now dead,
bite marks are discovered on one of the victims, and john byers has artificial
teeth all of a sudden. so the plot thickens. the other family members of
the victims chose not to participate this time and the courts didn't allow
cameras in this time so the documentary has a much more external pov.
this one turns into
a bit more of a media circus with these people who are like groupies trying
to free damien echols, echols increasingly playing up his victimization,
and byers looking more and more like the kind of guy capable of actually
doing this unthinkable crime. this whole thing is just so bizarre. basically
all the people involved are hillbillies or weirdos in some way. even some
of the people who are trying to free the west memphis 3 come off as a few
screws short of a hardware store. a total mess. B.
12/05/11
Graduate
- i don't know where to start with this review, so i guess i'll just ramble.
i've seen this film
no more than 10 times in my life, but i know without a doubt that it's
my favorite. it's not a perfect film, but it's as close to perfection as
i've seen a film ever get. it begs to be written and thought about and
it also is hilarious and touching and cathartic. it's emotional yet
technical. for me, it does everything a film should do.
the first 45 minutes
basically fly by for me. we get to know benjamin and all the preening adults
around him (none of whom have first names) who push and prod and influence
him as if it were going to improve their lives. that's what the film is
for me - a battle between the old guard and the new. we all know the mid-late
60s culture that produced this film and what they were fighting against
so i needn't do more than mention it. but the film is much more timeless
than a bygone era of hippies fighting against the vietnam war and patriarchy.
the film is timeless because it's a coming of age story about a guy (and
then a girl) who buck the old ways and strike out on their own; as each
generation should, i believe.
if i ever find myself
not liking, nay, loving this film then i need to take a hard look at who
i am and where i am in life. films like this and cool hand luke and paths
of glory provide a moral and philosophical compass for me that is as strong
as the bible is for real christians. and i don't think the fact that i
haven't seen the graduate in six years diminishes that either (though it
was too long to go without having seen it). the graduate reminds me that
we have to make our lives ours. elaine's mom, mrs. robinson, famously says
"it's too late," to which elaine responds (quite perfectly and succinctly)
"not for me." it takes elaine a while to get to the same place that benjamin
is at, but she gets there and if not for her who knows what would have
happened with him.
the courting of elaine
act is the least amazing of the three acts. the time where ben is in berkeley
following elaine and trying to convince her to marry him is the slowest
part of the film and the only imperfection the film presents, in my opinion.
it's a necessary element, though, and i think they play it quite well.
it's not overly long, but it's long enough to make you feel what ben is
feeling. it also gives some insight into elaine's character. she's lost,
as many college-aged kids are. she's not sure what she's doing. she waffles,
a lot. there's another man in the picture. there's a landlord to deal with.
ben is tested. it can be argued that this is when ben actually grows up.
he grows in a very superficial way during the first musical montage after
popping his cherry. but this is much more, and more subtle, than that.
then comes the final act when ben chases after elaine. it's perfectly punctuated
by simon & garfunkel's "mrs. robinson." and then there's the ending.
it's a perfect ending,
by the way. some will point out that elaine is already married or that
they're not smiling at the very end. correct on both points, and all the
more perfect as a result. benjamin is in the alfa romeo (is it a coincidence
that our film's romeo is driving a romeo?) when he runs out of gas. his
father bought the car for him so it's perfect that he should have to make
the last leg of his journey powered by his own two feet. he is locked out
of the front door of the church. i love the literal symbolism throughout
the film. i'm a literal guy, it's just my style i guess. of course a guy
like benjamin wouldn't be able to come in through the front door of a church,
especially to do what he has to do. he interrupts the end of the wedding.
the film audience, and the adults in the film all think he's too late of
course because they're trapped by their own conceptions of what the world
is and can be. benjamin rattles the cage, elaine comes to. she's drawn
towards him and she wakes up, figuratively of course. she makes a run for
it as does benjamin. he has to fight off the father and then the rest of
the wedding ceremony, this time with a cross (need i comment on that?).
they exit, he locks them inside using the cross (again, no comment necessary).
they run for a bus. it's a yellow bus, like a school bus, but it's been
converted to a municipal bus. again, a perfect choice. you think of them
as kids getting on a school bus, but you soon (if you hadn't already read
the side of the bus) find out that it's a public bus with a bunch of older
people as passengers. the two run to the back of the bus. the bus takes
off going forward, naturally. everyone is looking back at them though.
they are moving forward, but looking back. this image of moving forward
but being positioned to look backwards may have been stolen/borrowed from
flannery o'connor's "wise
blood." the meaning, either way, is the same - they are literally moving
forward in life, but looking to their past. just like all the adults in
the film do. they look at the younger generation and try to live vicariously
through them. ben's father with the scuba diving suit that cost over $200.
the guy who talks to ben about plastics. the women who preen over him at
the beginning of the film. mr. robinson who tells ben to sow his wild oats
(because he couldn't because he got caught in a loveless marriage with
mrs. robinson whom he had knocked up). mrs. robinson who is finally able
to sow her wild oats, though in the most rote possible fashion. so, you
have the older generation looking back while ben and elaine look forward
to their lives with the past that they left behind still visible through
the back window. they are giddy at first, like children. but they know.
they know what they've done and that life isn't a fairy tale. this is what
tom (from 500 days of summer) didn't know. he thought that love would conquer
all and that after that it's happily ever after. they know it's not happily
ever after, necessarily. what it is, though, is up to them now. they're
not a fairy tale nor are they part of a life that doesn't make any sense
and whose rules were written by someone who is long gone, as ben (more
or less) puts it while eating in the car on their first date.
the editing is also
perfection. some great cuts, a few great montages, the sound bridges really
make the first part of the film fly and lend a fluidity to the film. this
is probably what bogs down the berkeley scenes somewhat.
starts with a plane
landing in los angeles, same as die hard, another top 3-5 film. A+.
12/04/11
Page
One: Inside The New York Times - there's not much of a narrative
here, but the content and characters are interesting enough to make it
watchable and memorable. being inside the world's best, or at least most
influential, newspaper is exciting and interesting. david carr is a standout
as is the meeting he has with some of the guys from vice magazine. i can't
help but think that this is the beginning of a two and a half hour documentary
that would have been epic. it could have gone over in greater detail the
arc of the newspaper business, the ny times, the digitization and emerging
nature of news, the logistics of embedded reporters, etc. they touch on
much of this stuff, but not in great depth. B+.
12/02/11
Melancholia
- i learned two things from watching this movie: 1. kirsten dunst has a
nice rack 2. lars von tries too hard has nothing to say anymore.
ok, the real review.
this might actually be the worst film i've ever seen. usually i will tell
someone that gigli or kangaroo jack or something like that is the worst
film ever. true, those are epically bad films. gigli had good actors and
a capable director who came together to make a steaming pile of horse shit.
but it's also a film that is so bad, and bad in such a way, that you can
make fun of it. melancholia is not like that at all. it's just bad. really
bad. honestly, if not for the low cut wedding dress the dunst wears in
the beginning, the first half of the film would be utterly unwatchable.
because of the dogma movement i had confused von trier as the maker of
"celebration," (it was actually vinterberg) which is actually quite a good
film. unfortunately for von trier, he didn't direct that. he did do dancer
in the dark and the idiots (both of which i watched and didn't like) as
well as dogville, breaking the waves and antichrist. he also did a documentary
called the five obstructions which was intellectually interesting. long
story short, the guy isn't much to write home about yet people still watch
his films because he strikes a chord. often it's a very bad chord. i've
heard awful things about breaking the waves, for example, which makes me
want to watch it despite my bad experiences watching his other movies.
i heard great things about dancer in the dark and antichrist. whatever.
melancholia isn't an
offensive film, it's just awful. terrence malick is probably thrilled that
someone else made a pretentious piece of shit this year. i bet von trier
wishes he had thrown in a scene with a dinosaur or two; it would have made
for a better film. frankly if he had found a way to put in some of his
personal views on hitler
in the film i would have found it more watchable. it would have been a
more reprehensible film, but at least it would be watchable. F-.
Lilo
& Stitch - other than the animation of the characters' noses,
i liked this film. it takes the theme of the outcast and does it in a unique
way. middle of the pack disney film. B.
11/29/11
Paradise
Lost: The Child Murders At Robin Hood Hills - in terms of the subject
matter the only documentary, off the top of my head, that is as fucked
up is body without soul. i've never met anyone who has seen it, but it's
firmly in that genre of waking up privileged young white kids along with
dark days and, these days, 75% of the internet. this film, and its sequels,
are getting a bit of a resurgence because the west memphis three recently
got out because of dna evidence. the sequel came out in 2000 and the third
installment was just release this year, but isn't on dvd yet. it's a classic
errol morris thin blue line type of documentary where we get talking heads
and fly on the wall content and are left to our own devices to develop
an opinion. i didn't know anything about the dna evidence or the verdict
until after i watched the film, but as i got near the verdict i put it
this way - i wouldn't convict them if on the jury, but i could see them
doing it. primarily because damien seemed like the kind of guy who could
get into that kind of trouble without much worry and could convince the
two dumber kids to go along with it.
just like the media
covers the presidential elections like a horse race, it's easy to see that
this case turned into a circus. it's easy to look a million different ways
- at the dressing black angle, blame it on metallica (sanitarium is one
of my favorite songs of theirs by the way, and it comprises most of the
film's soundtrack), look at the stepdad who maybe did it, look at the idiotic
police department, etc. what it comes down to, though, is that 3 kids were
raped and cut up savagely and none of this circus is going to help that.
pretty messed up. good documentary though. B+.
11/27/11
Rookie
Of The Year - kids sports movie that is neither bad nor good. gary
busey plays a half way likable and normal guy and that was the highlight
of the film for me. boy has that guy gone off the deep end. C+.
11/25/11
Good
Hair - chris rock documentary about black people's hair. it's really
well done and chris rock interjects some humor while also holding people's
feet to the flame a little bit. for example, i knew that black women would
get a weave done to have long, flowing hair and i knew that it would take
several hours. however, i didn't know that it could easily cost over $1,000
(+ the cost of the hair) to do so. when rock finds out about this he asks
the women in the parlor what job they have that they can afford such an
extravagance. it's an interesting documentary because it touches on so
much about our society and about black society. why does society generally
reject black hair as beautiful? why did blacks turn away from the pro-black
movement of the 70s? why do blacks buy 80% of the hair care products in
the country? why does worrying about beauty manifest itself this way for
blacks and in body image (liposuction, botox, breast implants, etc.) for
whites? it caused me to think a lot about society and beauty and how we
spend our money so i had a good time. the hair show competition, that he
follows to add some narrative to the film, didn't do much for me. B+.
11/24/11
(500)
Days Of Summer - a different experience the second time around,
but not necessarily in a bad way. still a really solid and fun/moving film
to watch, but knowing how it turns out took some of the edge off. both
leads are perfectly cast. cathartic and funny, this is a great film. A-.
11/23/11
Jack
And Jill - fart. if you just laughed then you might like this movie.
otherwise, probably not. it's adam sandler, i mean with every one of his
films i feel like i don't really have to say much because you know how
you're going to feel about it already. i laughed the first half of the
film and the second half fizzled. it gets a bit mean-spirited i suppose
and it's not one of his best efforts, but if you're considering watching
this then you're probably about as sold as you need to be already. if you
groaned when you heard about another happy madison production then this
one certainly isn't going to change your mind about sandler. C.
Descendants
- alexander payne at his best is cutting edge, funny, and an envelope pusher.
he took on abortion and statutory rape with his first two features and
both were funny and entertaining. about schmidt was a step backwards in
my opinion, but sideways was funny and engaging and maybe more mature than
his previous films; certainly you couldn't knock him for that. here, though,
he takes another step back. again the film is about a man facing a crisis
in his life, but this time it's a wealthy, good looking george clooney
not a midwestern school teacher or a huffing pregnant female or a (let's
say) less attractive and desperate alcoholic. the casting choice doesn't
work and even payne knows this. in his interview on fresh air he laments
the fact that in order to get a movie made you have to have a star attached
who is popular at the time that you're looking for funding. when asked
why clooney was right for this part, payne said "he's the right age, he's
the right look and coloring for someone, one of those handsome rich guys
out in hawaii..." he also said something about a sense of detachment that
clooney exudes, but the first things he cited were: age, look and coloring.
clearly something is missing in that answer.
as for the writing,
which is usually quite sharp in payne films, it just lacked here. the situation
that the film presents is difficult, but there's just no snap to the dialogue
or characters. here it is a week later when i'm writing this review and
i can't remember much about the film other than the look of it. yeah, it
captured island living pretty well so i guess that was nice. it had some
good laughs and at least one good character (the smart ass kid who tags
along with clooney's family the whole time). the kid actors were good and
considering that fact i think that the film would have been better off
following their perspective more than the adults. it probably would have
made for a more dramatic and humorous film if we didn't know about all
the b.s. adult problems in the film - the land trust decision that clooney
has to worry about, for example. C+.
11/22/11
Other
F Word - good documentary about punk rock musicians who have become
fathers. they talk about their parents, punk music and what it's like being
an authority figure after railing against authority their entire professional
career. it's a great topic and even though it doesn't have a great narrative
structure, it's got plenty of great content. they get a decent number of
second, third and lower tier musicians. for me the top tier is: ramones,
clash, sex pistols. after that it's everyone else. the guys they get are
in the position where they can tour reliably and get paid, but aren't so
popular that they can retire off their royalties. so not only do you have
the ideological battle between authority and punk, but you also have the
practical battle between needing to tour for money and wanting/needing
to be a parent. has some truly touching moments and is worth checking out
if you're a music fan or parent who had some rebellious times in your past.
B+.
Thank
You For Smoking - better than i remember it being. it squeezes
a lot of juice out of the idea that freedom and equality of representation
of ideas are necessary in culture. it's odd because usually it's the conservatives
who deride the liberals for saying that all forms of sexuality should be
accepted, but when it comes to smoking causing deaths the conservatives
are much more, well, conservative on the issue. "well...i don't know the
science isn't real strong on that or global warming or evolution." at any
rate, it's a funny film that's well written and acted. B.
11/21/11
Into
The Abyss - i'm not a herzog fan, but this one was pretty good
because it's a documentary with some valuable content. generally speaking
his opinions on the topic didn't add much to the discussion, but the people
who were involved in the triple murder that the film follows were interesting
enough to make his comments fade into the background.
perhaps the most compelling
interviewee is fred allen who carried out dozens of state sponsored murders
while being employed by the state of texas. it was his responsibility to
prep the inmate before each execution, including the first female in the
state's (country's?) history. he spoke candidly about it and how it affected
me. why we continue to do this is beyond me.
i would have loved
to see the same documentary done by errol morris and watch them back to
back. B+.
11/18/11
Couples
Retreat - it's your basic comedy in every way. vince vaughn and
jason bateman are solid as usual. kristin davis has a place as an actress,
but here she is supposed to be a woman on the prowl looking to get away
from her marriage and it doesn't work. other than that it passes the time
effectively. B-.
11/17/11
Like
Crazy - it's a film about young love, but it works. as older people
we roll our eyes and judge their stupid choices, but we should never forget
what it's like to be young. i'm reminded of it everyday i go to work on
the cal campus and see people who are struggling with the things that we
all struggle with at that age. we're never fully formed humans, and we're
certainly not there at age 20. the film captures this age well and the
sort of relationships that come as a result. it's not rational, it may
not last forever, it may be messy, but that's why the film is titled "like
crazy." both leads did a good job and the writing and editing are noteworthy.
the editing, in particular, was effective in the way that it portrayed
the passage of time with bridging sound and time lapse photography among
other techniques. solid flick. B+.
11/16/11
Happy
Gilmore - this is the adam sandler movie that even non-sandler
fans can like. it's juvenile, but in a somewhat more endearing way that
usual. perhaps it's the dynamic between him and julie bowen. perhaps it's
the juxtaposition between the stereotypes of hockey players and golfers.
here you see happy trying to become a better person, because of bowen and
his grandma. we see him struggle with his anger and ultimately triumph.
it's funny to see him relapse and fight with bob barker, but we know he's
trying. this is different than some of his other films where a switch is
just flipped and the puerile guy matures overnight. whatever it is, the
film works both as a comedy and it even earns the sentimentality that it
injects. A-.
11/14/11
Airplane!
- good off the wall comedy with plenty of classic moments. wasn't a huge
fan of kentucky fried movie, but this one is similar yet effective for
me. B+.
11/09/11
Revenge
Of The Electric Car - shows four different people who are working
toward making electrical cars a viable product. the tinkerer, the entrepreneur
(tesla motors) going up against the big guys, one of the new school big
guys (nissan) and an old school big guy (chevy). it's interesting stuff
if you're interested in the technology and the movement. ultimately it's
going to come down to cost and how long these people stick with this stuff.
i hope that the big players stick with it for the next 10-20 years because
that's what it's going to take. B.
Gattaca
- good sci-fi film with a thought-provoking premise. often, for me, the
sci-fi film is about the premise more than anything else. what fundamental
difference in the future are they highlighting and what does that say about
our society today? what does it say about humanity in general? here the
idea is that nurture can be as important as nature. it also shows the fundamental
humanity that cuts through societal norms (love triumphs, personal achievement
is still important (hawke's boss), communal is still present, etc.) good
film. B+.
11/07/11
Martha
Marcy May Marlene - knew absolutely nothing about this film going
into it. turns out that the lead is the olsen twins' little sister which
i guess makes sense once i look at her long enough. but 1) she's a better
actress by a long shot and 2) she's way better looking. it's a really good
film and olsen and hawkes both turn in great performances. the writing
is spot on accurate with regards to the dynamic between the sister wives
within the cult/commune. the human mind is a twisted thing and this film
does a good job of exploring how twisted it can get in the right/wrong
circumstances. the eponymous character reminded me of an unholy mix of
the worst of my cousin and sister. i was disappointed by the ending. B+.
11/06/11
Unguarded
- from the writer of 'the best that never was' which may have been my favorite
from the 30 for 30 series, comes another cautionary tale about an athlete
who fell short of his potential. this one is a basketball player (chris
herren) from massachucetts who basically shits away his life thanks to
his addiction to drugs of various kinds. it captures the essence of addiction
well and you see the way it eats away at everything around herren. addiction
is all-consuming and it's really a shame that we don't have a better system
in place to deal with it. some say that addiction doesn't go away it just
gets replaced. well, in this case the addiction to drugs is replaced by
an addiction to recovery and telling his story. if you've ever hung out
with people from the 12 step program you know that it becomes they're new
addiction in many cases. they talk about the system all the time and the
people they know in the program, etc. it's the lesser of two evils i guess.
at any rate, the film
does a really good job of showing the ebb and flow of herren's life. B+.
11/05/11
Bedtime
Stories - it's adam sandler so the review pretty much writes itself
at this point. this isn't one of his strongest, but it's watchable. it
has elements of fantasy along with the usual sandler motifs. something
that doesn't go noticed between the farts and puerile humor is that sandler's
films are actually quite wholesome in their content. ultimately good always
prevails, hard work and humility are rewarded, etc. B-.
Collateral
- good michael mann film that held up well a second (or third?) time around.
good soundtrack. dvd version doesn't show the gritty nature of the cinematography
nearly as well as the theater experience did. foxx is good, cruise is better.
good movie for six degrees of kevin bacon. B+.
11/04/11
A
Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas - about as good as the second
one which is to say not nearly as good as the first one. has lots of wink
wink references to real life which added an extra layer of interest. ultimately
the laughs were decent, but not as great as the first. could have used
a punch up. B-.
Tower
Heist - better than anticipated and that seems to be the consensus.
the entire cast is good, but i have to give a shout out to precious' sidibe
who was funny and showed some good range. i'd watch it again. B.
11/03/11
Killer
Elite - not horrible, but longish and short on narrative interest.
the action wasn't special, none of the characters were unusual and the
'based on a true story' aspect wasn't enough bait to keep me interested.
C.
In
Time - i'm not one to normally point out a lot of questions about
the plot inconsistencies or logic gaps raised by the idea of picture, but
this one certainly had some things that made me wonder. the key with this
kind of thing, at least with me, is to either keep it vague enough that
i don't ask a lot of questions or to answer all the questions throughout
the film.
timberlake has a niche
in film and this isn't it. he just can't pull off the character who is
supposed to be of great morality and strength. instead timberlake plays
him flippantly because that's timberlake's acting card. this role needed
paul newman or steve mcqueen, someone with quiet strength. ultimately it's
an interesting idea that gets you thinking about how society would be if
time were currency. how should we function, how would we keep order, etc?
but the film itself wasn't great. C+.
11/02/11
Horrible
Bosses - still funny the second time around. all the bosses are
great and so are the guys who are enslaved by them. good chemistry with
the cast and writing that fits everyone's talents well. B+.
Ace
Ventura: Pet Detective - not as good as dumb and dumber, but one
of the important comedies because it established the jim carrey style.
not a huge number of laughs for me at this point, but it has its place.
B.
Cops
- good keaton short with plenty of misunderstanding and an epic chase through
town. the extension ladder gag was memorable. B.
Scarecrow
- another good keaton short. this one has him on the farm where he lives
with another guy in a small room so everything has to have two purposes.
so the bed is also a bookcase and that kind of thing. reminiscent of electric
house in that it gave keaton an opportunity to show off all these clever
devices. he was a very creative filmmaker. one of a kind, really. B.
Make
Mine Music - series of shorts made into a feature length animated
film. this one was self-censored by disney so i only saw nine of the ten
shorts that were in the original. the hatfield and mccoys short (entitled
the martins and the coys) was taken out of the dvd version because it was
too violent. bullshit. it's on youtube so i watched it that way later.
this also has the casey at bat short. i actually liked this one, even the
musical segments. B.
11/01/11
Margin
Call - good cast with subpar writing and directing. some of this
stuff is really cliched and film schooly instead of being natural or tense.
i didn't believe spacey's character even though he does his best to sell
it. in the genre of unemployment drama that we're getting these days, this
film ranks as one of the lowest because of its wasted potential. needed
a total rewrite. C.
10/26/11
People
vs. George Lucas - documentary that pretty much rehashes all the
usual star wars issues, loves, gripes, etc. i'm not a huge star wars guy,
but i know in fair detail the argument against lucas and how he's treated
the original films as well as the many faults of the prequels. i know he's
squeezed the fans for all they're worth with useless merchandise and i
know that his filmmaking career died after star wars. this summarizes all
that in exhausting detail. if you're a huge fan you'll like it and if you're
not aware of the considerable controversy as well as some of the fandom
surrounding the films then you may like this. otherwise it's not worth
the time. C.
10/25/11
Take
Shelter - spoilers ahead. it's a picture about a man who sees visions
of what he thinks is an upcoming apocalypse. for almost the entire film
this was a great picture about mental health issues and how they affect
the afflicted as well as those around him. it approached that topic with
as much tact and honesty as any film i can recall. then, in the end, it
seemed to throw that away; maybe. frankly i'm really split on the ending.
i'm not ambiguous about what happens, but about how i feel about it. does
it matter that the hallucinations end up being prophecy in the end? does
that undermine what the film portrayed about mental illness? dunno. for
as thin a plot as the film had, though, this moves pretty well. michael
shannon is oscar worthy and so is jessica chastain. chastain has one of
the better female characters i've seen of late and she nails it. B+.
10/23/11
Lord
Of The Rings: The Two Towers - the extended version maybe needs
some trimming, but it's a solid installment in the series. things really
get going and i love the orcs and the orc theme. wish there was more of
them and more of the battle stuff at helms deep. maybe the first one is
better after all. A-.
10/18/11
Home
On The Range - nice enough disney film with some star power (more
than usual) in the voice department. not particularly memorable one way
or another. C+.
10/16/11
Playhouse
- keaton short about a playhouse and all the high jinks that occurs there.
keaton at one point plays about 20 different characters, including a monkey
which he does quite well. there's nothing amazing or particularly memorable
here, but it's an entertaining short. B.
10/12/11
Brick
- (unsure of date i viewed this) good flick with a crazy screenplay that
you almost need subtitles for because so much if is made up (kinda like
juno). it's a teen noir film so it comes will all the style of the great
noirs, but updated. great film in terms of originality and writing, but
not as entertaining as i recall it being. B+.
10/11/11
Dotted
Line - short spurlock documentary on espn about sports contracts.
easily could have been twice as long if it went back and looked at curt
flood and other important sports contracts in the past. it could have gone
into further depth about the realities of pay for play in collegiate athletics,
the realities of the short termers in sports, etc. there's just a lot to
be addressed when it comes to the economic side of sports and what goes
into getting the next big fish to sign with your team or sports agency.
what it did touch it did well with, it's just incomplete in my opinion.
B.
Black
Cauldron - a lot like sword in the stone in terms of animation
and characters, but much darker. this is the only film in the disney line-up
that i've seen so far that i felt wasn't suitable for all ages. it gets
quite dark and features some pretty heavy themes. could have been a cool
outsider film in a mostly family-friendly catalog, but it was unfortunately
not very engaging. B-.
10/09/11
Ides
Of March - taut political thriller. has a good deal of the backroom
dealings that happen in the political world. as a fan of the west wing,
this is the kind of thing that i really enjoy.
i can't say i'm a huge
fan of the two clooney-directed films i've seen, but this one was interesting
and fun. it's also more complex than many may expect from a guy who is
an obvious liberal. it doesn't just portray the liberal candidate (played
by clooney) as some idealistic and perfect fdr reincarnate. he's a flawed
guy, i'll leave it at that.
the film also has a
really good supporting cast. lots of big names doing what they do best.
in the end, gosling is the star and he is a michael coreleone type character.
i half way expected the film to end with a door closing in our face. B+.
Real
Steel - rocky with robots. long runtime and a definite cheese factor
detract from the film, but honestly it wasn't as bad as i had expected.
spielberg is good at getting good kid-centric films and this is no exception.
he only produced it, but it has his stamp in that way. the kid (dakota
goyo) was really good and followed well in the footsteps of other spielberg
proteges like drew barrymore (e.t.) and dakota fanning (war of the worlds).
C+.
10/07/11
Brother
Bear - starts off corny, but picks up steam after our native american
protagonist turns into a bear and is forced to experience life from a different
point of view. it definitely fits into one of those native american stories
you hear about bears or bisons being reincarnated chiefs or something.
the idea being that we're all connected in that way so we should respect
one another. really liked the pair of canadian moose who provided some
good comic relief. B.
10/06/11
Southern
Belles - another anna faris film. this one is crap and it's the
film that made me realize that i should probably go short on netflix stock.
D.
10/04/11
Sarah
Palin: You Betcha! - nick broomfield's latest effort has the hallmarks
of his previous works. he's always looking for truth and he doesn't really
seem to care who is giving him their opinion. there doesn't seem to be
a vetting process with his work which i guess is kinda refreshing. like
errol morris, broomfield investigates subjects that have no clear truth
and he demonstrates this very well. here he gets a lot of the wasilla folks
to talk about their thoughts about palin and it's not altogether flattering.
he also gets her parents to talk, but she never bothers to give her side
of any of the stories. basically the film makes her look like a career
politician who wants influence and attention. i don't think that's news
for most people who follow her. it is interesting, though, to see people
from her home town talk about her growing up as a person and politician.
B.
10/03/11
Electric
House - keaton short about a mix-up that causes keaton (a botanist)
to be in charge of designing the electrical work for a rich man's house.
he does a really good job in reality - installing many rube goldbergean
type devices throughout the house. unfortunately they're just a little
too prone to keaton's clumsiness. keaton is bean or the pink panther before
they existed - the hapless hero who bumbles about. B.
Swimfan
- erica christensen plays a psycho (what else is new?) in this nice little
teen thriller. it's a cautionary tale on the downsides of sex and infidelity.
completely predictable genre piece, but it's well done. B.
Groomsman
- more or less the same as beautiful girls. it's one of those buddy flicks
with a bunch of good old boys meeting up for the first time in a long time.
they get drunk a lot, walk down the middle of the street late at night,
have big arguments, but ultimately they're all there for each other. how
sweet. D+.
Carnal
Knowledge - a pair of college roommates talk about sex a lot and
go through several relationships. garfunkel and nicholson are both good
and the dialogue was engaging. it's nowhere near the brilliance of the
graduate. frankly, it's abundantly clear by now that nichols is a fine,
but unexceptional director who got lucky with the graduate. he was a good
player on a great team. here he's a good player on a good team and the
outcome is a decent, decidedly 70s picture. it was entertainingly enough,
but i'm not sure where it was going. B-.
10/01/11
Chicken
Little - not one of the better disney films. it's cgi animated
and it has a lot of action so i think they were trying to appeal to a young
pixar audience. unfortunately none of the characters were very striking
and the music was subpar. C+.
09/30/11
What's
Your Number? - typical of today's romantic comedy in that the characters
are well-versed in the sexual arena, but still looking for love. in this
case, though, she doesn't put out because of a superstition brought on
by a cosmo-esque article that says 96% of women with 20+ partners don't
find a life partner. in the end she finds that her true love was in front
of her the whole time and all is well. anna faris is a funny actor, but
she's gotten a distracting amount of plastic surgery and that's too bad.
chris evans is a good looking guy who is totally forgettable outside of
his role as captain america which was a breakthrough for him since he finally
had some humanity and depth to his role. this film is firmly in the prosaic
and forgettable category. not so bad as to be distasteful, not good enough
to be memorable. depending upon who you ask that's either the worst possible
thing or not so bad.
C.
50/50
- not as good as i had hoped. it's aptly named because it's exactly in
the middle of drama and comedy and unfortunately didn't do either exceptionally
well. ultimately i think the blame is on the director and the writing since
the cast was certainly good enough to execute a good screenplay. anne kendrick
is moving up in my book quickly, seth rogen is a proven commodity and joseph
gordon-levitt is already one of the best of his generation. ultimately
the film never found strong enough footing to make it fulfill its potential
as a moving and funny film. B-.
09/27/11
Catching
Hell - story of the infamous steve bartman play. for those who
have lived in a cave, away from baseball for the last 10 years, the play
involves the perennially cursed cubs finally making it deep into the playoffs
with a good team. 5 outs left to get to the world series a ball is hit
down the left field line stands and hooks just enough to be on the border
of the stands and out of bounds. multiple fans make a grab for it as does
left fielder moises alou. steve bartman gets his hands on the ball first
and alou isn't able to make the out. he blows up and everyone in the stadium
eventually gets wind that bartman has ruined the game. this feeling escalates
as the cubs proceed to choke in epic fashion, allowing 8 runs in the 8th
inning. double play ball is missed in the 8th by the shortstop and the
pitchers couldn't get a hold of the game seemingly after the bartman incident.
the film is directed
by alex gibney who did enron: the smartest guys in the room and taxi to
the dark side, which i think may have won an oscar for best documentary.
it's not just a documentary about bartman and the one play, though, it's
a film that looks into the very nature of humans and the mob mentality
that takes over in these situations. people are savages, it's really that
simple. it's very easy to see that we "evolved" from apes because most
of us are still quite close to them.
gibney gets a lot of
good interviews with people who called the game, people who were close
to bartman at the time of the play, other people who were at the game,
writers who have tried contacting bartman or have written about the play,
as well as players who were involved in the game/series. he also puts it
in the context of bill buckner, another infamous scapegoat who also blew
a play in a critical game 6. unlike bartman who was a fan, though, buckner
was an athlete on the field. like bartman, buckner was singled out despite
the facts. in each case it was the 6th game, not the deciding game. in
each case there was a play either just before or just after that was just
as bad as the scapegoat play - for buckner it was the wild pitch by the
pitcher which allowed the tying run, for bartman it was the double play
ball that was bobbled by the shortstop.
it's a depressing sight
to see a humble and innocent guy be lambasted for doing what basically
everyone who has been around baseball would do - go after the ball. the
documentary runs a little bit long, but it's great because it works on
so many levels. it recalls other close calls, it gets conversations started
about sports, the role of the spectator, mob thinking, the role of the
media, etc. good stuff. B+.
09/26/11
Mean
Girls 2 - mostly shitty sequel to a mostly good and well-intentioned
comedy. the original had a good message, some nice laughs, and a good cast.
this one merely capitalizes off the name and nothing more. cliché
and actually more of a remake than it was a sequel. D.
09/24/11
Moneyball
- i'll just say it up front - major league is the only other baseball movie
that comes close to this one for me. with one viewing this movie just about
moved to the top of the baseball movie genre. aaron sorkin does another
true story and brings it to life as few can. he's great at mixing drama
and comedy and building characters. he did it well with the west wing,
he did it well with the social network and he's done it again here. moneyball
is about billy beane and paul depodesta who, while everyone else in baseball
is looking right, look left. another of lewis' books is also like that
- the big short is about the economic collapse of 2008. everyone looked
one direction assuming that derivatives and securitization of mortgages
were a great idea, but a few didn't and became very rich as a result.
as good as brad pitt
was, i think that jonah hill was even better. he's typically a funny guy,
and he gets laughs here, but he's more subdued than usual and to good effect.
also well-directed. B+.
09/22/11
Other
Man - cliché, uninteresting and poorly written film about
a guy goes looking for the man with whom his dead wife had an affair. there's
some talent here, but none of it is in the writing department so it never
gets off the ground. heavy handed and not at all interesting on a human
level. C-.
Prowler
- good noir with van heflin as a cop who does some pretty dark stuff. typically
there is the femme fatale, but here it's all van heflin coming up with
the idea to kill the husband of his lover and cash in on the insurance
money. the woman is caught between that and her absentee husband so it's
unique in the way it represents the woman. i love it when the noirs get
really dark and this one goes there; mostly with the way heflin plays the
woman's emotions and doesn't tell her what he's up to. again, typically
it's the woman who is pulling all the strings, but here heflin has a master
plan and executes it perfectly; almost (of course). in the end the well-intentioned
neighbor type gets in his way and the shit hits the fan. good stuff. B+.
09/21/11
Wild
And Wonderful Whites Of West Virginia - documentary about a family
of hicks in west virginia who come from a tradition of dancing. the film
doesn't really cover the dancing too much, rather it focuses on the inane
and insane characters in the extended family. they're pretty much all on
drugs and it seems that at least one of them is in jail at any given time.
it's the liberal stereotype of the southern or back country hick. the conservative
side of the same coin is the black welfare queen living off the government
and having 8 kids from 7 different guys. it's essentially the real life
version of winter's bone, but, oddly, without any meth. they seemed to
do every other drug in the book, but not meth. to me, it just proves that
these problems are caused by upbringing and class, not race or geography.
B.
09/19/11
City
Lights - basically a compilation of skits or set pieces with a
narrative strung around it. from a plot perspective, this isn't chaplin's
finest work. from a laughs perspective, however, it's quite good. it also
has some real tenderness to it with the tramp and the blind girl and the
love there that exists outside of class and appearance. chaplin was a romantic.
it's a great film and a very funny one. A-.
09/18/11
I
Don't Know How She Does It - pretty basic fare here. olivia munn
is good as a somewhat misanthropic, hard-working woman who is parker's
assistant. she's the comedic highlight of the film. the rest is your standard
red meat for women, and there's nothing wrong with that. they need their
transformers/western film equivalent, too. a safe and unexceptional film.
C.
Straw
Dogs - saw the original almost 10 years ago and didn't review it
for some reason. i recall that one being more violent and having a somewhat
different plot, especially when it came to how the home invasion came about.
i also remember it being a more disturbing and unsettling film. i also
remember the original playing up the emasculating of hoffman's character
more, but i could be wrong about all this. i'll have to revisit it.
right off the bat i
felt like marsden was wrong for the main character. he's too good looking
and well-built. hoffman fits the bill of the twerpy outsider more than
marsden. it was a miscast part, but he did relatively well with it. relocating
the film to rural mississippi was a good move. set against the backdrop
of the war in iraq and high school football and all that it worked pretty
well. too bad it didn't come out 5 years ago when it would have been even
better. not a bad remake. B-.
Drive
- 9 out of 10 times when you go in to watch a movie there's a pretty small
number of things that you can expect to happen. when i watched "i don't
know how she does it" i knew what to expect; and this is by design. we
know the stars, we know what they do, and we can expect a certain kind
of entertainment. sarah jessica parker is a working mother so we know we're
going to have some pro-women's rights stuff, probably some voice over narration
to make the transition nice and seamless for the sex and the city crowd,
some tough times, a little romance and naughty sex stuff, and, ultimately,
some triumph. we'd be surprised, for example, if she fell into a deep depression
and went on a killing spree or if she divorced her (good and doting) husband
and didn't regret it. we'd be shocked if she shirked her duties as a mother.
movies are like life in that they're fairly predictable if you've been
around the block once or twice. well, drive isn't like that so much.
watching drive was
kind of like watching pulp fiction for the first time. i'm not saying that
this is on that level, it really isn't. but when watching both i felt like
anything could happen. you're on a ride. as the film is capable of anything,
so is the eponymous character. gosling has come into his own since half
nelson came out a few years ago. he's a real actor in a world of mere characters.
i wasn't entirely thrilled
by casey mulligan. where gosling didn't show his cards came off as mysterious
and like the proverbial river whose current runs deep, mulligan's vacancy
was more puzzling than mysterious. what's she thinking, what's she doing,
what's her story? obviously she's in a dead end relationship with her husband,
but what drives her? is she just floating along like a leaf on the water
or what? it would have been good to know her more.
i also felt like refn
held back a bit. refn's pusher trilogy is the thing of legend among certain
circles, but this is his first american film. the opening scene is perfectly
understated and probably the best opening scene of the year. it's both
what the film was and wasn't quite. there's a latent power aching to be
unleashed in this film and i felt like it never really reached that. it's
like the tron soundtrack - great, but could have been epic.
unfortunately a film
like this just won't play well with american audiences. it's a great film
with a lot of power just under the surface, but it's not the kind of action
that people expect these days. it's not a michael bay film with 15 minute
long action sequences. it's got bursts of intense horror and action (which
got my audience audibly disturbed) followed by long breaks of the relatively
prosaic. it's an exercise of tension and that tends not to work round these
parts. B+.
09/15/11
Meet
The Robinsons - another surprisingly good late-era disney feature.
it's up there with bolt and atlantis and has the cgi animation of bolt
and pixar productions (it's also a lasseter-produced film so that makes
sense). it's about an inventor kid who travels through time to learn about
himself. it's similar to back to the future in a couple ways, but it's
its own film. like treasure planet it has a likeable villain, but this
film is much better than that one. i actually had some feelings for the
characters and that's always a good thing. predictable plot and ending,
but that's no scar on a film made for kids. B+.
09/14/11
Contagion
- similar to outbreak, but better from what i remember (though it has been
16 years since i saw that). builds the tension well and doesn't get preachy
or too outlandish. i did nitpick some of the specifics. i don't think that
a vaccine would be developed so quickly, for example. mostly, though, they
get it right. chaos ensues, the outbreak spreads quickly, etc.
i'm a pretty liberal
guy, but i think they overestimate the ability of the government to get
on top of an outbreak. there are some good policies in place, but i just
don't trust that they would have identified everything as quickly as they
did in the film. there's always a lot of misinformation and unwillingness
to act (as evidenced by one of the local politicians who didn't want to
stir up fear). bottom line is this: if this kind of thing ever happens
it's going to be a couple weeks at least before you can expect any kind
of substantive help from anyone. if you think this kind of thing could
happen then you should be prepared with non-perishable food and water.
probably wouldn't hurt to have protection, gas, and a generator as well.
as someone who has
watched a lot of apocalypse-type films, and loves the genre, i'm always
thinking about this kind of thing. i found this one to be pretty accurate
in terms of what to expect from individuals and social systems.
soderbergh consistently
entertains and always gets his audience to ask questions. there's only
one film of his that i've seen that i didn't like (full frontal) and for
a guy who makes films that are so different, that's a pretty damn good
record. he's also the kind of guy who probably has one film that can please
just about anyone. for some it might be sex, lies and videotape for others
it could be ocean's eleven or traffic or che or erin brockovich or out
of sight or contagion. there's enough diversity in his stuff that he's
probably pleased everyone who likes moves with one of his films by now.
B+.
09/13/11
Hercules
- one of the less entertaining disney animated films i've seen. the songs
leave something to be desired, the animation of the characters isn't very
good, just not much here. some good talent in the voice department and
a few funny puns, but that's about it. clements/musker direct, they also
did treasure planet which was another disappointing film for me. C-.
09/10/11
Apollo
18 - paranormal activity on the moon. unfortunately it doesn't
build the tension like paranormal activity does and it's very predictable.
had this film come out 10 years ago it would be a different story, at least
then it would have been somewhat novel (though still a blair witch rip
off). C-.
09/07/11
Interrupters
- from steve james (hoop dreams) comes another story about chicago youth.
this one is about a group of crime interventionists who work to stop violence.
it follows several of them as they work with chicago youth who are violent
or surrounded by violence.
it's a good documentary
to watch at this time because we're at a crossroads politically. to me,
though, the documentary shows the failure of ideologies from both the democrats
and republicans. the republicans say that the inner city kids should pull
themselves up by their bootstraps. i'd like to see you do that after generations
of slavery, disenfranchisement, and a lack of opportunities and role models.
the other side says let's give them food stamps and money and cheap rent.
that doesn't work either. the majority of them stay in the hood and don't
better their situation with the hand out. one girl said she'd take any
money she got, buy drugs and then sell them for a profit. the work these
(mostly ex-cons) do is inspiring and unfortunately necessary. it's also
sad to see that these are the only people that most of the kids in the
inner city will respect. the white woman teacher at one of the magnet schools
in the film is basically laughed at when she suggests that the children
can talk to her if they have problems at home with violence. they would
much rather talk to the eddie, the reformed murderer who is one of the
eponymous crime preventers. it's understandable, but also a sad commentary
on ghetto culture or human nature, at least.
these problems aren't
going to get any better anytime soon. we have a lot of dedicated people
trying to solve them in a lot of different ways. change has been incremental
at best. one guy at a community meeting said that "we need to fix this
on our own." the local mortician expressed dismay "i never thought i'd
see a black president and now we have one, but this is still happening."
others pointed out the crumbling infrastructure of the schools. B+.
09/06/11
Girlfriend
Experience - starring former porn star sasha grey this is one of
soderbergh's indie efforts. soderbergh is one of the most interesting filmmakers
of our time in part because he so effortlessly switches between indie and
mainstream films. for every traffic and ocean's eleven there is a girlfriend
experience or schizopolis. he's known just as much for sex, lies and videotape
as he is for contagion. he does both equally well, too. the film is about
a high class/price call girl who has a lot of financial sector clients
and it takes place during the recession and financial crisis of 2008. you'd
think that a topic such as that with a porn star as
the lead would
mean lots of sex, but there really isn't anything. it's a substance film
and there's more here about gold vs. the dollar than there is about sex.
i'm really uncertain about the film's purpose or message, if there even
is one. the ending left me wondering. is it a film about us all paying
to get screwed by the financial sector? is it simply a small story about
one girl during a turbulent time? i don't know. it's an interesting film
regardless. B.
09/05/11
No
Strings Attached - decent romantic comedy that gets sappy at the
end. lake bell is funny as the awkward stopgap that kutcher hooks up with
after portman ends things. B.
Piranha
- in the tradition of the 80s nature horror films. has tna and plenty of
gore and not much substance beyond that. in other words, a great distraction
from the real world. i never saw the original, maybe i'll add that to the
list. B.
09/04/11
Pacific
Heights - michael keaton does well as a renter with bad intentions.
matthew modine is miscast as the fiery landlord/boyfriend of melanie griffith.
kinda fits into the stalker genre. B-.
Atlantis:
Lost Empire - one of the better late-era disney films. doesn't
have the music that makes little mermaid, beauty and the beast and aladdin
so good, but the characters and animation are there. james garner and michael
j. fox are both good and able to make a good showing in a film despite
being 70+ years old and having parkinson's disease. many of the disney
films have different animation leaders for each major character, but it
seemed to really make a difference with this one. the audrey ramirez character
looked like something out of archie comics (round and sweet). the commander
rourke (james garner) character looked more like something out of g.i.
joe (angular and menacing).
the film wasn't as
sweet as many disney films and the main character is a boy instead of a
girl, which is somewhat unusual, but not unprecedented (101 dalmatians,
aladdin, hercules, bolt). it also had some jokes that would play mostly
to older audiences. i don't know how much the kids would like it, but i
suspect that the parents would enjoy it. B+.
09/03/11
Help
- much talked about early oscar contender. it's rocky to start off, but
it finds its legs later on. emma stone isn't especially good here which
is a disappointment since she's been hot lately. the rest of the cast picks
up the slack though. it's ostensibly a film about race in 1960s mississippi
(do we really need another about this time and place?), but to me it was
more of a film about being a woman. there really aren't a heck of a lot
of men in the film and they play very minor roles anyway. i appreciated
the spectrum that the film showed. a lot of times when you have an all-black
or all-woman film the men or the whites in the picture are stereotypes
- the men are all brutes and the whites are all racists. here, though,
we see a wide variety of southerners and whites and men. the truth is much
more complex than black and white and the film portrays this gradient fairly
well. unfortunately it's probably true that some blacks liked the simplicity
and stability of staying with one white family for most of their lives.
it's also true that some in mississippi probably saw the fundamental unfairness
of the situation and wanted to move past the jim crow, separate but equal
type thinking. and, of course, we know well of the deeply-engrained racism
and how that played out.
the tone of the picture
belies, somewhat, the subject matter. it was more light and playful than
most stories that cover this time and these themes. it was off-putting
and a bit unsettling at first, but either it found the right balance or
i got used to it as the film progressed.
some of the talk i've
heard surrounding the film revolves around the question of what it means
to like the film. does it make you a racist for thinking that only whites
can help blacks out of their situation? is it an uplifting film about race
relations or does it just perpetuate the tired cliches? i think there's
something to be said about this, but i don't buy it completely. on the
one hand i think the 70s films were much more honest about race relations
in america. pam greer and rudy ray moore films showed a country that was
still uneasy about its race relations and still had things to work out.
they acknowledged the differences in cultures in an honest way. today's
films on the topic are more hopeful, but perhaps more unrealistic. this
film has a bit of all of that which makes both sides of the debate easy
to argue.
in the final analysis
i think that the film shows a range and what you latch onto may say more
about you than it does about the film. you can latch onto the deeply racist
women who push their housekeepers into different bathrooms. you can latch
onto the emma stone's housekeeper as an example of whitey trying to feel
good about basically enslaving a black woman ("she wanted to be emma stone's
housekeeper so it was okay"). you can point to octavia spencer's character
as a stereotype (she's got an attitude and a husband who beats her). or,
you can look at the whole thing and see it as one person's representation
of the times. i think it was both representative and aspirational. there
were elements that were honest and true and there were elements that were
reflective of how we wish things were. B.
08/31/11
Treasure
Planet - based on treasure island, this disney pic takes place
in space. they lean more heavily on computer animation for the backgrounds
especially so it has a different look than the early stuff. not necessarily
better or worse, just different. it's more crisp, but it's also not as
artistic. the main villain is interesting because he's a sympathetic character
and he doesn't really get punished in the end because, as it turns out,
he has a good heart. the true villain is some relatively minor character
that gets his due, but doesn't figure all that prominently. music was below
average. morph was a good character and so was the villain (john silver),
but no one else was all that interesting. B-.
Midnight
Run - a year after planes, trains and automobiles came out this
similar film was released. it's not in the same class as that masterpiece,
but it's a good film. deniro is a bounty hunter and grodin is an ex-mob
accountant who didn't know he was working for the mob and ended up stealing
from the mob and giving to the poor. now he's being hunted by deniro, a
competing bounty hunter, the mob, and the fbi. it's got a little bit of
comedy and adventure. the growth of the two characters and their journey
are what drive the film. deniro and grodin both turn in good performances.
a little on the long side. B+.
08/27/11
Superbad
- about as good as i remembered it being. first half is better than the
second half. the middle is basically your run of the mill night on the
town while trying to get laid sequences as seen in harold and kumar or
any number of high school/college flicks. has some iconic characters and
moments, but isn't a brilliant film. B+.
Knocked
Up - the best of the apatow productions thus far. realistic, funny
and touching. a bit long, but a very solid film on all fronts. i like the
scene where rogen chews out rudd for not warning him about heigl's feelings.
immediately after this rudd flips the switch and begins singing happy birthday
for one of the kids. it's about compartmentalization which is a necessary
attribute for a good parent. A.
08/26/11
My
Idiot Brother - rudd is really good and i wish he was in more stuff.
it's a black sheep comedy with rudd as the idiot hippie brother. his cast
of sisters is an unlikely grouping, but they work well together comedically.
B.
Colombiana-
luc besson has done better, but he chose the wrong director here. he chose
megaton, when he should have gone with morel. both are french action directors,
but morel did district b13 which had the kind of direction that would have
saved this film. zoe saldana is officially unimpressive. the film relies
too heavily on cliches. the characters do the "latin temper" thing during
arguments and that's about the extend of their acting. relying on a racist
cliché isn't acting. C.
08/25/11
Tarzan
- good use of movement in this disney flick. i think they relied on computers
to do a lot of the complex movement through the forest. i liked tarzan's
animation. his facial movements worked well when interacting with both
apes and humans. none of the songs did much for me. tarzan's relationship
with his ape mom and dad were good and effective. pretty good on the whole.
B-.
08/24/11
30
Minutes Or Less - decent enough writing to earn a "b," but the
direction and casting weren't up to snuff. swardson and mcbride were good
together. swardson plays a character i wouldn't have cast him for, but
he actually does a good job with it. the biggest problem with the cast
is that eisenberg isn't very funny and ansari was woefully miscast. the
film passed the time and i didn't think it was as bad as the reviews are
indicating, but it definitely didn't deliver the kind of laughs we can
expect from the a-list comedies of judd apatow or the frat pack. C+.
08/22/11
Crime
After Crime - story of a middle-aged woman (debbie peagler) who
killed her boyfriend and had served 20+ years by the time the documentary
begins. two lawyers take up her cause pro-bono to get her out. she was
beaten and pimped out by the guy and more or less arranged for the guy
to be killed, but didn’t do it herself. the lawyers argue that the most
she should have served is 6 years for a lesser charge. a new california
law makes it possible to rehear the case and introduce the abuse as part
of the reason behind the murder (it wasn’t brought up in the original trial).
it turns into a multi-year
legal marathon with the requisite ups and downs. i think you have to be
careful to not read too much into the film. the filmmakers definitely make
the case that her case is indicative of many others in california. they
say that 80% of the women serving time for murder were involved in abusive
relationships of some kind. the “some kind” makes me wary because that
could mean a lot of things. kinda like when they mention that arnold reduced
funding for domestic abuse programs around the same time that peagler was
facing parole. taken out of the context of state-wide cuts and a financial
crisis like the state has never seen, this looks callous and like one more
snub by the system. in reality, everything got cut under arnold, so it’s
disingenuous at best.
quibbles like this
aside, it is a good and compelling story of someone who was clearly failed
by the system, her family, support structure, community, police, d.a. and
pretty much everyone along the way. on an individual level it’s a sad and
somewhat inspiring story. she overcomes a lot and perseveres in spite of
a roller coaster of legal issues. on the larger level it’s really disheartening
to see, again, how slowly the wheels of “justice” turn. doing the right
thing is a painful process for those in power. admitting wrong doing is
painful for them. the film doesn’t even mention the increased emphasis
on plea bargains in criminal trials. clearly, peagler should have been
given a better day in court, but she was railroaded like a lot others are.
i believe that most people in jail probably did something to deserve it,
but they should get their day in court and they just aren’t because the
numbers make it impracticable.
one other thing i liked
about the film is that it opens up a whole debate about personal responsibility
vs. government’s role, purpose and effectiveness of the criminal justice
system,
biggest factors leading to her fate, etc. some will say that her father’s
absence was a breakdown of the family unit and that was the biggest factor.
the fact that she wasn’t married will be a problem for them as well. others
will point out the lack of quality police involvement and community resources
for battered women; the police could have ended things before they got
as serious as they did. others will cite the overcrowded criminal justice
system or the overreach of the government as the most atrocious aspects
of the case. some will say she probably got what she deserved. she didn’t
kill him herself, but she had him killed so 20+ years is appropriate, regardless
of what happened to her. B+.
08/21/11
Girl
With The Dragon Tattoo - finally got around to checking this film,
the first in the millennium series, out. it's pretty standard in terms
of its arc and substance. it's part revenge film and part mystery film.
the combination of the two isn't even all that unique. however, that doesn't
mean the film isn't a good one. the two main characters work well next
to each other and the other characters in the film highlight something
about the main two in one way or another. it's a long film, but that makes
sense because originally film was conceived as a two part miniseries on
tv (six total parts). it's a bit difficult to keep up with the family tree,
especially if you're bad with names like me. a good film, i look forward
to the others and the remake(s). not necessarily for the timid. B+.
Boys
And Girls Guide To Getting Down - comedy that is shot like a how-to
documentary. actually, it's very informative on drug and club culture so
it was fascinating from that perspective as well as providing some good
laughs. lots of boy vs. girl humor which is always fun. definitely off
beat, but a nice little film. B.
Girl
Who Played With Fire - not as good as the first one, but good enough
to keep me interested in the series and watch the third. B-.
08/20/11
Bolt
- one of the better late-era disney films i've seen. it's also the only
one i've seen that uses cgi. it's produced in part by john lasseter who
does a lot of pixar stuff, so that makes sense. the look is actually better
than pixar in my opinion. a good sort of classic story, maybe similar to
oliver and friends. it's, to my knowledge, an original story which is somewhat
unusual for disney which relies on adaptations for many of their films.
bolt is a good character and the animation was a good change. B.
08/19/11
Fright
Night - another summer, another vampire movie. this one's not too
bad though. anton yelchin is the a kid next door to a vampire (farrell)
who has recently moved into the neighborhood. yelchin ends up being the
only person aware of the fact that farrell is a vampire and there's a rear
window kind of dynamic that develops. it's one of those films where the
kids are in charge of solving the mystery and saving the day. it drags
a bit toward the end, but it's forgivable. B.
Final
Destination 5 - pretty standard for the series. one really good
kill and the rest were pretty average. i wish they had done a little more
rube goldberg type stuff leading up to the kills. if you liked the others
then you'll probably dig this one as well. it does a good job of passing
the time and there's a little twist at the end. B.
08/18/11
Guard
- funny little irish comedy with cheadle and gleeson. starts off funnier
than it ends. in the very beginning we see a car full of idiotic kids driving
too fast and they crash. gleeson is a cop who doesn't react as one might
expect. he nonchalantly walks up to the car and checks their pulses; they're
all dead. then he goes through their pockets and finds some drugs. this
is the most important part of the movie - is he going to book it into evidence
or throw it away or take it for himself? he takes one for himself and throws
the rest into the sea. it's funny and tells about as much as you need to
know about him. B.
08/17/11
Winnie
The Pooh - haven't seen the original in a long time so i can't
compare the two, but this one is a nice enough little adventure for pooh
and the gang. short and to the point. didn't love the voice of piglet and
eeyore. B.
Inside
Job - great documentary that mows over everyone who helped contribute
to the financial meltdown. they throw academics and politicians under the
bus just as quickly as they indict big banks. barney frank and chris dodd
seemed to get off a bit easy as i think they were part of the problem was
well, so maybe there was a bit of partisanship there.
here's a blow by blow
of the financial crisis of 2008, as told by the movie and as summarized
by me. they didn't get everything. there are a million great stories in
this meltdown. stuff about magnetar,
the
big short, the
conversations in the room between paulson et al, the
madoff story that came later, and much more. we're going to be picking
this one apart for many years and we'll probably never learn from it because
some forces are extremely good at painting this as a failure not of the
market, but of overregulation. 2+2=5.
securitization
lenders no longer on
the hook for loans. the deconstruction of intelligent reforms begins.
pushed toward suprime
mortgages
-higher interest, higher yield
-incentivize predatory lending. because people need more motivation to
be selfish and evil.
once unable to speculate
with savings, that ended.
investment banks
-board/partners put up money in past, that ended.
deregulation of savings
and loan associations, under reagan. who else?
-keating, hired
by alan greenspan. match made in heaven.
income
disparity spikes in 1928 and 2008 (my note)
2004, paulson lobbies
sec to lift limits on leverage. because he's really smart.
-bear stearns and morgan/stanley leverage more than 30:1. great idea.
no regulation of credit
default swaps. de facto insurance. multiple people insuring same properties/securities.
genius at work.
front loading compensation
for investments. high bonuses for short-term payoffs. long-term? not my
problem. i'm rich, bitch.
magnetar. movie just
mentions them. pro-publica
wins pulitzer for their reporting on shiesty ass company.
many see collapse coming.
fbi in 2004 say they
see epidemic mortgage fraud
imf,
roubini,
raghuram
rajan, and allan
sloan all write about impending doom between 2005 and 2008.
3/16/08. bear stearns
bought by chase. $2/share
9/7/08. freddie and
fannie taken over by govt.
9/9/08. lehman stock
collapses
sept. 2008. mishkin
jumps ship like a douche.
sept. 2008. b of a
acquires merrill lynch
9/16? lehman brothers
allowed to go bankrupt. international markets seize
9/17 aig taken over
by government. we pay 100% of stock value because we're chumps.
9/18. $700 billion
tarp bill proposed. paulson says "trust me," republicans don't fall for
it. i thank republicans for the first time in my life.
A.
08/16/11
Enron:
Smartest Guys In The Room - "what's the difference between california
and the titanic? at least when the titanic went down the lights were on."
- jeff skilling, inmate #29296-179, former enron ceo, class A douche bag.
i don't know what it is about white collar criminals but i hold them in
the same regard as pedophiles and rapists. honestly, give me five minutes
alone with either class of individual and it's not going to be pretty.
i consider myself a pretty lenient and liberal guy, live and let live and
all that, but guys like ken lay and jeff skilling are total scum in my
book. this is a great documentary and so much of it applies to the housing
meltdown. lots of little cogs along the way not doing their job correctly
or ethically or doing just their job and not asking questions. then there
are the architects and the scum traders who planned the whole thing or
actively "took grandma's money" as they put it. these people are parasites
and i have more sympathy for the average death row inmate (who at least
has the excuse that he was probably butfucked with a bucket of bleach by
his dad) than the average bernie madoff or jeff skilling type a-hole.
ok, i got that out
of my system, sorry about all the cussing. a $45 billion money grab from
california to texas and i have to put up with articles
about how fucking great
the texas system is?! shiesty fuckers. ok, now i'm done. A.
08/15/11
Pocahontas
- disney marathon continues with this one. i thought the animation was
a strong point here. pocahontas is a bit angular at times, but if you look
at who voiced her it
actually makes sense. good pastoral scenes reminded me of bambi or a thomas
kinkade painting. at least two solid songs including the one towards the
end where both the whites and the indians sing about the other side being
full of savages. there was a point in my life when i was anti-establishment
and disney represented that in a lot of ways. they were too wholesome and
vanilla. now, though, i've come to respect them to a certain degree for
their longview on topics like habitat destruction (bambi), inner beauty
(beauty and the beast), and differing perspectives on colonialism or "the
other" (pocahontas). this is a good one. B+.
08/11/11
Adventures
Of Ichabod And Mr. Toad - not quite sure when i watched this, but
it was in the last couple weeks. barely remember this one. it has two stories
that didn't seem to have much to do with each other thematically or otherwise.
one of the worst of the disney films from a story standpoint. missable.
C-.
Protector
- this is the kind of action stuff that jackie chan would be doing if he
were still 25 or 30 years old (although it lacked his sense of humor).
some great stunts and one really memorable scene. jaa raids a building
that is reminiscent of the guggenheim in nyc - circular with a ramp leading
you to the top, but this one has stairs. at any rate, he fights his way
to the top and it's all shot in what appears to be one take. he kicks ass,
throws people down into the center courtyard below, breaks things over
fighters' heads, etc. you can tell he's getting tired by the time he's
disposed of like 50 different attackers and made his way to the top, but
that makes it all the more believable and awesome. some good, creative
fight choreography. the story is pretty average for the genre.
foley artists worked
overtime and probably went through enough celery and pig bones to feed
a small village. B.
08/10/11
Picture
Perfect - harmless jennifer aniston romantic comedy with jay mohr.
definitely made in the 90s and it's funny how dated that makes it in some
ways (music, fashion). it's about a woman who claims she's engaged so she
can get a better job - actually her friend makes up the story, but she
plays along because of the extra money, etc. of course things all come
out in the end and it ends happily. nothing out of the ordinary here, but
it does have at least one good scene when her bosses meet her "fiancé"
and she tries to "break up with him" so she doesn't have to keep up the
charade any longer. a few laughs, but nothing great here. other than aniston's
hotness of course. C+.
08/09/11
Hunchback
Of Notre Dame - disney animated version isn't as good as the laughton
version. starts off well and had some promise. unfortunately the songs
weren't all that great and none of the secondary characters helped propel
the entertainment in any meaningful way. animation is nice - more on par
with beauty and the beast than pocahontas. B-.
08/08/11
Rise
Of The Planet Of The Apes - james franco is a good actor, but he's
not on his game here. his character is definitely problematic, but instead
of playing him as tortured and conflicted by his allegiance to caesar (the
laboratory chimp), his father and science, franco plays him as a guy who
doesn't do a lot of thinking. instead, he's just a guy who kinda does what
he needs to do to make others and himself happy at the time - steal some
drugs and inject them in his father to hopefully cure him. take caesar
to a park in spite of the fact that he's a goddamn chimpanzee. it has several
little references to the first planet of the apes movie which was cool.
the visual effects were really good, especially when the chimps weren't
moving. movement still poses a problem for the effects artists, but they'll
get that eventually.
andy serkis (who plays
caesar and played gollum in the lotr movies) was really good. he has this
market (motion-based acting) cornered and will be remembered as a pioneer
20 years from now. caesar was actually the best character in the film and
he's largely to thank for that. B.
Change-Up
- good, raunchy comedy in the tradition of freaky friday or like father
like son. both leads did a good job of playing the other person. the casting
works, too, because both has a definitely comedic style so it's easy to
pick out elements of reynolds in bateman when they are switched, and vice
versa. leslie mann is good as bateman's wife. it feels like an apatow film
because she's in it and because the emotional points of the film actually
work on some level deeper than the average comedy. B+.
08/06/11
Johnny
Guitar - mercedes mccambridge is a class a bitch in this hayden/crawford
western. it's about a guy who is a hired musician who comes into town and
it turns out there's a lot of internal turmoil. there are a lot of layers
here and much of relationships within the film is more implied than explicit.
you have to read between the lines when it comes to the motivations of
certain characters or their feelings for each other. to me, the film is
primarily about these relationships.
a major aspect of many
westerns is the unknown or unseen relations of major characters. there
seems to always be some big grudge or previous slight that motivates the
characters. they seek revenge or they're wary of others because of something
that happened. they're tortured, tense, mysterious, angry. perhaps it all
relates back to the civil war or something. B.
08/05/11
Crazy,
Stupid, Love - pretty standard mid-life crisis kind of movie here,
with at least one really good scene that makes this one recommendable.
the cast is uniformly good. ryan gosling shows his range even more here.
he's one of our best young-ish american actors. B.
Cowboys
& Aliens - really good idea with the unique setup of a sci-fi
flick that takes place in the past. they almost always take place in the
future or present. time travel movies don't count. unfortunately there's
not much meat here. frankly it was a disappointment. favreau is a good
director and there was talent elsewhere, but the script just wasn't there.
everything was flatter than it should have been (insert inappropriate olivia
wilde joke here). oh well. C.
08/04/11
Terri
- decent, but odd indie pic about a kid who has trouble fitting in and
basically has to take care of his senile uncle (also his sole guardian).
it felt longer than it was and had a couple odd scenes, but was fine on
the whole. john c. reilly was the driving force as the assistant principal
who takes terri under his wing. he's great at what he does because of his
honesty and vulnerability. he screws up, but he's always well-intentioned
and honest about his shortcomings. realistically, that's all you can ask
for in a mentor. B-.
08/03/11
Hall
Pass - just good the second time around. christy lemiere didn't
seem to like it, but i thought it was one of the more thoughtful farrelly
brothers movies. hmmm, maybe that's not saying much. at any rate, it hits
the nail on the head when it comes to man-woman relations and it's got
like 20 seconds of dick shots so there's something for everyone! B+.
08/02/11
Project
Nim - one of the better films of the year. it's about a science
experiment wherein they sought to see how much a chimpanzee could adapt
to humans and learn language. the chimp was named nim chimpsky (after noam
chomsky the linguist who said that humans are the only species that could
form sentences and use proper grammar). long story short, it turns out
he was mostly right, but this experiment was carried out by one of the
dumbest and least ethical scientists i hope we've had here in the last
40 years. he slept with his students and practiced poor science to boot.
one of his ex-students took care of the chimp for the first few months
and she was a total 70s hippie who let nim do whatever he wanted. the film
shows more about human nature than it does about chimps. it's an aggravating
film to watch because of the idiocy of some of the people involved and
their expectations of a wild animal and its ability to fit into our world.
morons. B+.
08/01/11
Ox-Bow
Incident - good western with henry fonda on the back burner a bit.
it's about a posse going after a murderer. they get their men and blood
is shed, but was it just? reminds me of 12 angry men and shows you the
power of a group/mob. short but sweet. B+.
07/31/11
Groundhog
Day - a nice take on romantic comedy. it also shows the full evolution
of a character over the course of a long time (just how long is a matter
of debate). usually a film takes place over the course of less than a year
and in that time you see the protagonist come to some epiphany and they
change radically and are then able to finally settle down or be the right
match for someone or whatever it is. often this isn't altogether plausible,
in part because of the time constraints. here, though, we see the protagonist
(who is rather unlikeable to begin) go through an entire evolution in a
believable way. it begins with denial and then he has fun with it by embracing
all the sinister things he couldn't before - he becomes a glutton, a thief,
a serial lover, etc. then he becomes depressed and kills himself in several
(comical) ways. then he tries to get something a little deeper and works
on attaining it by learning the piano and actually becoming a better person.
in the end he has evolved enough that the universe kicks him out of the
moebius loop and back into the human world.
in a world of films
that may be entertaining but unoriginal, it's nice to see one that is both.
bill murray is the perfect actor to play this character. the jerk who we
find entertaining in spite of his many flaws. A.
Miracle
- one of the best sports films of all-time. they get everything right here.
the accuracy of the game, the look of the in game footage, the backdrop
of the cold war, etc. add to that the fact that it's one of the great u.s.
sports stories and you have a classic. A.
07/30/11
Freakonomics
- documentary of the book. there's a good assortment of directors doing
each chapter within the film so that keeps things interesting. they don't
cover everything that the book covers, but they do a good job of getting
the thrust of the book which is that incentives rule behavior and we should
always keep them in mind. it also illustrates just how scheming and immoral
humans can be. as a race we pretty much look for the path of least resistance
and do that which is in our own self-interest. they conclude that it's
impossible to foresee the consequences of a given policy with the seeming
conclusion being that we shouldn't even try to shape human behavior. B.
Mulan
- between lion king and princess and the frog there were about a dozen
disney films that i never watched. this is one of them. it's about a strong-willed
girl who dresses as a boy to be a warrior. it's a bit different because
it's not about a powerless girl waiting to be rescued by a guy. for that
reason it's a nice departure. none of the secondary characters, though,
were all that interesting and the song didn't do much for me. nice idea,
just not very well executed. C+.
07/27/11
Friends
With Benefits - not as good as no strings attached, which is essentially
the same film, however it does have some poignancy to it thanks to the
underrated richard jenkins. jenkins plays timberlake's father who has dementia.
timberlake's issue is that he can't open up with people, especially girls.
kunis' issue is that she can't seem to find the right guy. they're both
20 something hip, successful big city types. there are about 25 jokes about
new york and la in the first half hour of the film. frankly i found it
obnoxious how much they wanted the audience to know that the movie was
filmed in new york (to such extent that there was a fake film within the
film that served as fodder for the characters to comment on how fake other
romantic comedies are - "that's shot in a studio in la." "oh, listen how
the music swells to signify that we should be feeling something." etc.).
the point being that the filmmakers know this is a "rom com" and it is
therefore limited by its genre. it's referential to film and pop culture
in other ways too. there are a million references to music (closing time,
third eye blind, kriss kross), celebrities (clooney, heigl), and movies
(it happened one night, on the waterfront, bob & carol & ted &
alice). it's always reminding us where it is physically and within pop
culture. honestly, none of that added to the film in anyway for me. i'm
not sure if it was to make a point about expectations of love because of
the media that surrounds us or what.
overall it was a passable
film with two stars that have been better elsewhere. it wasn't great as
a comedy, but the romantic arc was more or less believable. the big finale
isn't cliché but we knew it wouldn't be after they say how cheesy
rom coms are. B-.
07/26/11
Sullivan's
Travels - classic film with a basic idea. for me it boils down
to this: life sucks and we can't even know how much it sucks for some people,
but as long as we have comedy it's probably worth living.
it's about a film director
who wants to get away from making crowd-pleasing comedies and musicals
and make a picture that will change the world. he calls it "o brother,
where art thou?" (yes, that's where the coens got the title). his producers
tell him he's crazy and he's had a silver spoon in his mouth since day
one so what the hell would he know about hardship. so he resolves to live
the hard life and travels with the tramps and eats out of trash cans and
comes back a changed man. but things get real when he's robbed and mistaken
for dead and ends up in a chaingang and gets a real taste of the hard life.
it's a great and simple story with
a simple yet profound
message during a time when people could use such a story.
there's even "a little
sex in it" with veronica lake in the shower pressing her body up against
a clear shower curtain while yelling to someone in another room. A.
07/24/11
Transformers:
Dark Of The Moon - for me, this was the best film in the series.
megan fox is hot and was an adequate actor for the role she played in the
first two. the new girl(huntington-whiteley) gets more material to work
with (she actually plays a critical role in the fight against the decepticons),
but isn't as hot. my major gripe with these films is that they play down
to a younger audience too much for my taste. they have these cheesy little
jar jar binks type characters that are pretty much useless.
that said, the film
pretty much roles along fairly well. we establish some stuff with our protagonist
and his new girlfriend, his worried parents and his role in the new economy.
kind of a lot of plot and much of it has nothing to do with saving the
world, in other words it could be called character development. weird.
but the real thrill of the film comes in the last hour which is prety much
cgi/effects artists and michael bay showing off. and it's about as impressive
as it gets in my opinion. there are some stunning effects and the colors
are as impressive as you expect from a bay film. it's a spectacle that's
for sure. we watched it in 3d and he uses the format well, though i still
am not sold on it being worth the extra $5 or whatever it is.
honestly, for it being
2.5 hours this movie went by pretty quickly. for me it's pretty much all
id when watching this stuff, but you need that kind of thing from time
to time. if you're a boy between 11 and 40 you're probably going to like
it. if not then maybe not so much. B+.
07/23/11
Captain
America: First Avenger - liked the first half better than the second.
the origin story, seeing captain america skinny and weak, etc. that made
his character a lot better in the second half when he's kicking ass. without
that this would be just another story of a kick ass superhero. B.
07/22/11
Tabloid
- classic errol morris in content and style. there's no philip glass or
robert mcnamara, but it's still an interesting story told from a few different
perspectives. the engaging protagonist is a woman (joyce mckinney) who
abducts her onetime boyfriend (a mormon who has moved to the uk, presumably
as part of his mission). her story is that he was abducted and the other
story is that he went there as part of his mission and felt guilty spending
time with her. what really happened on god will ever know, but it's still
a compelling story and another film from morris about the power of perspective.
B.
Beats,
Rhymes, & Life: The Travels Of A Tribe Called Quest - i own
(yes own) all but one of a tribe called quest's albums, but i'm not the
hugest tribe fan of all-time. i love their first two albums, but was a
bit surprised to see this documentary about them hold midnight marauders
on such a pedestal.
it's like many other
music documentaries. it tells of the internal divisions, the creative genius
of the artists at their height, their maturation (and lack thereof in some
instances), etc. i don't watch a lot of music documentaries because all
the stories are pretty similar and this one fits that mold, but tribe was
an important group in hip-hop and two of their albums are classics so i
figured i'd give it a shot.
it's directed by michael
rappaport and he did a fine job of telling the story and an even better
job of picking who did the score. the music of madlib and peanut butter
wolf dovetails nicely with that of tribe so that was a good touch. it was
also good to hear q-tip talk about his dad's influence on his musical tastes.
while dr. dre and nwa were sampling funk and r&b, q-tip and tribe were
sampling jazz. it was an exciting time in hip-hop (late 80s, early 90s),
i just wish it was the same today. B.
07/21/11
Mysterious
Skin - watched this just because joseph gordon-levitt was in it.
it's about two boys who are raped as kids and how that experience manifests
itself later in life. jgl becomes a gigolo and the other kid becomes an
alien chaser (because he has suppressed the memory and thinks he was abducted
by aliens instead of raped by his t-ball coach). on the whole it's a relatively
difficult film to watch and i didn't get much out of it. even for jgl fans
i think this one is a pass. C-.
07/19/11
Pony
Excess - the final 30 for 30 in the set and one of the few feature
length documentaries they made. this one is about the smu football program
and the "death penalty" judgment that the ncaa handed down after a second
violation of pay for play rules. my views on this are probably well known
if you know me - simply put, i think that the athletes that generate billions
of dollars of revenue that is shared by the schools, apparel manufacturers,
media outlets, video game makers, etc. should get a cut of the pie. they
are the ones taking the physical risk, they are the talent, they should
get something more than a free education. you can decide where to draw
the line as to amount of compensation and who gets it (only division 1a?
only the marquee players? only men's programs with media contracts?), but
the bottom line is that they deserve more than they are getting monetarily
and the ncaa should also do more to protect the kids from the vultures
and leeches who inevitably work their way into these programs.
the smu case is somewhat
unique (at least in terms of programs that have been caught) in that they
displayed a pattern of skirting the regulations and putting their players
under contract. they were de facto professional players at a college program.
did they deserve the punishment they got? probably, especially after they
were warned before. should it have ever gotten to that point in the first
place? not in my opinion. in order to make things right, we need to do
the right thing by these kids - educate them on fiscal responsibility,
educate them to the fact that only 3% of scholarship division 1 football
players are going to make it to the professional level, educate them about
the pitfalls of stardom, inform them of the kinds of people who are going
to try to take advantage of them, and (not least of all) pay them. if the
ncaa made things right in those ways then they could get on their high
horse and hand down punishments with some actual moral authority. until
they fix a broken system, though, i really can't be all that critical of
a program like smu or usc or unc or miami. there are degrees (least to
worst offenders: usc, unc, miami, smu), but even a case like this can't
get me too upset because of the degree to which the system is unjust. B.
Three
Caballeros - disney (mostly) animated film that takes a little
tour of the countries south of the border. donald duck has never been my
favorite. animation is at times good, but mostly just average. no great
songs. the best part of the film is the documentary aspect of it which
looks at local customs in many different central and south american countries.
B-.
Saludos
Amigos - pretty much the same as the above film. B-.
07/18/11
Lord
Of The Rings: Fellowship Of The Ring - still a good film, though
some of the effects are a little opaque by today's standards. the essence
here, though, is in the characters and the battle between the evil of the
ring and how that interacts with each person. this time around i was looking
at it as a story that upholds the fundamental worth of each person. despite
race, each person in the fellowship brings something unique and necessary
to further the goal of destroying the ring. it's a long film (we [sean
and i] watched the extended version), but it plays well. A.
Exit
Through The Gift Shop - read the accolades on the dvd cover and
you'll think this is some amazing documentary that is going to rock your
world. in reality, it's a fairly average documentary on the street art
scene and one man in particular. a hanger-on who documents everything in
his life, including many nights he spends helping street artists throughout
the world as they put art (usually) on the side of buildings. he ends up
taking a liking to it and decides to become a street artist of his own.
he then drums up a bunch of hype, mortgages his house, and puts together
a ridiculously large show of his work. he's basically a wannabe and all
his art is a regurgitation of warhol or banksy or fairey. he's a farce,
but the art elites seem to buy his crap so he makes a ton of money and
makes the street artists either jealous (because he got so popular/rich
so quickly) or angry (for selling out). either way, this isn't that amazing
of a documentary and it certainly isn't as iconic as style wars which is
the definitive graf documentary. B-.
07/09/11
Best
That Never Was - this should be mandatory viewing for every prospective
division I ncaa athlete, particularly those in basketball and football.
it's about marcus dupree, a mississippi running back who went to the university
of oklahoma and could have been one of the great running backs of all-time.
he had reggie bush type talent, but matt leinert type work ethic and may
as well have gotten advice from his pet dog. it shows everything that can
and does go wrong at the college level and exposes (without being an expose,
per se) the weaknesses of a system that cares only about money.
he's poorly advised
at every stage.
he has no father.
his mother is well
meaning,
but ignorant of the business and laws and expectations of being a top level
recruit.
his "agent"/advisor
- some shithead pastor takes total advantage of him at every turn and is
nothing more than a svengali manipulating a young kid after earning his
trust.
the coaching staff
at oklahoma failed him by trying to play the tough love card on a guy for
which it wouldn't ever work. a big part of being a great mentor/coach is
either changing your approach to fit whomever you are working with, or
only recruiting the guys who will fit in your system. barry switzer picked
up dupree not because he was going to fit his system, but because he wanted
the biggest fish he could catch that year.
he failed himself with
a poor attitude and work ethic.
his community failed
him by constantly holding him on a pedestal.
the ncaa failed him
by not having adequate rules and systems in place to make sure he was being
advised of his options along the way.
if a top level athlete
watches this perhaps they will realize they're really only a knee tendon
away from being forgotten trash along side the college athletics highway.
it's really a sad story, but it's one i've heard too many times to be shocked
by. it's one that the ncaa should do something about, but they really only
do the minimum required to look like they care. B+.
Wizard
Of Oz - one of the best films of all-time. directed by victor fleming
who also directed gone with the wind in the same year. name one director
who has two better/equal films released in the same year and i'll be shocked.
it's a playful musical ahead of its time. feels more like a film from the
50s than the 30s. the use of color is especially striking. how did they
find so many little people for the munchkin scene? as good as it is, i
don't think it's one of my favorites, maybe because it has a more theatrical
feel to it. i could watch it anytime and have a good time and find joy
in it, but it lacks something that would make it reach that next level;
at least it did this time around. A.
07/08/11
Horrible
Bosses - really funny comedy that i'd watch again tomorrow. the
ensemble cast does a really good job and is excellently cast. the writing
may not be for everyone, but it fits well with today's brand of humor and
kept me laughing. one of the best movies of the year. B+.
07/07/11
Marion
Jones: Press Pause - puff piece that tries to make marion jones
look like she's reformed and was never that bad a person to begin with.
she cops to what she did at a couple points in the documentary, but then
also tries to equivocate or explain away what happened. she says
that her going to jail came down to a split second decision to lie when
asked if she knew about, or had ever seen, the steroids the interviewer
was holding in front of her. in reality, she went to jail because she constantly
tried to keep her drug use a secret thinking she'd never get caught. not
to mention the check fraud that she was involved with or the bad husbands
she married along the way. it's a story of redemption where there really
isn't much. she's a marginal wnba player and a marginal human who took
us for a ride because she has lots of talent and a good smile. C.
Kings
Ransom - story of wayne gretzky being traded to the la kings. it
shifted the balance of the nhl - two more california teams came after gretzky
arrived. but more importantly it changed the oilers and gretzky. wayne
made it to one stanley cup finals afterwards (he had won 4 already with
the oilers). it's one of those business decisions that probably made sense,
but killed edmonton fans for many years. it's not unlike the lebron "decision"
and his move to the heat. B.
07/04/11
Silly
Little Game - (watched earlier, forgot what date). 30 for 30 about
rotisserie league baseball and the advent of fantasy baseball. it's interesting
to see how these geeky guys created a phenomenon that is such a part of
baseball and football entertainment now. B.
16th
Man - (watched earlier, forgot what date). basically a 30 for 30
version of invictus. don't watch them both. C.
House
Of Steinbrenner - directed by barbara kopple who did harlan county
usa and a couple other notable documentaries. odd that she was involved
in this one, though, as it doesn't seem to fit her barbara ehrenrich type
sensibilities. basically covers the yankees under george steinbrenner.
say what you will about the guy (and they say most of it here), he cares
about his team and wants to do everything he can to win. i'd bet money
that any fan of any team in sports would love an owner like him or mark
cuban. B.
Into
The Wind - this 30 for 30 is about a canadian kid who loses a leg
to cancer and begins a run across the country (a marathon a day, on one
leg) to help raise money and awareness for the fight against cancer. he
gets through a couple thousand miles and then gets another couple tumors,
this time in his lungs. he dies before he can finish the run. it's one
of those stories that's just unreal because of how strong and determined
the guy is, yet life still beats him down. sad shit. B+.
Four
Days In October - covers the red sox comeback vs. the yankees.
down 0-3, they win 4 straight (only time in baseball playoff history) to
their bitter rivals. it's one of the best comebacks and stories in baseball
history. the bloody sock, big papi's big homeruns and hits. crazy stuff.
B+.
Once
Brothers -
feature length 30 for 30 on vlade divac and drazen petrovic and yugoslavia.
they were teammates on the yugoslavian team and after winning gold, a spectator
with a croatian flag came on the court. vlade took away the flag because
he wanted people to respect the victory as one for yugoslavia, not as one
for just croatia or just serbia or any other region in the former yugoslavia.
petrovic, a croatian, took it the wrong way and they were no longer friends
after that moment. the documentary gets into the fall of yugoslavia, divac's
and petrovic's rise in the nba, and the broken relationship between the
two. it's one of those sad stories of human nature. we keep grudges too
long sometimes and can't reach across the aisle often enough, and there's
no
shortage of such stories; sadly. one of the best of the 30 for 30 films.
B+.
Tim
Richmond: To The Limit - playboy nascar racer is surprised when
he gets aids and dies. ok, it's not that bad, but the truth is that the
guy lived a dumb life having sex with every woman who walked his way and
ended up paying for it. that said, aids wasn't known to be the problem
that it is today. in a way the real tragedy here is that he continued to
deny he had the disease because of the stigma it had as a "gay cancer."
had he been more up front he could have made his life a little more useful
than it was as a guy who makes left turns his whole life. B-.
Fernando
Nation - i knew about fernando valenzuela, but i didn't know how
dominant he was his rookie year. he was a big time acquisition for the
dodgers and turned around the team for the foreseeable future. if not for
him, the latino fanbase that is the majority of dodgers fans, might be
very different. B+.
Catch
Me If You Can - one of spielbergs better late-era films. the story
of frank abignale is quintessentially american. a kid who wants to do better
than his dad and judges his success monetarily. makes it big as a thief
and conman and then ends up working for the government. classic stuff.
we love our outlaws and we love people who are great at what they do. abignale
was both. A-.
07/03/11
City
Hall - adequate political thriller of sorts. felt like an episode
of law and order more than anything else. i'm interested in politics so
it kept my attention, but nothing about it was particularly noteworthy.
cusack's new orleans accent wasn't good, pacino was fine, the script had
some clever stuff, but wasn't much better than a good tv show. C+.
Little
Big Men - old guys recalling their glory days as usa little leaguers
when they beat the heavily favored taiwanese team. i guess it was a great
triumph because of how good taiwan had been the previous 11 years (won
9 championships, was banned for one, and lost one), but it's taiwan. they're
a little island country so i have trouble making this into the little league
equivalent of the miracle on ice. not all that great overall, but a nice
part of sports history anyway. C+.
One
Night In Vegas - compares mike tyson and tupac and how they were
similar in many ways and how, during one night their lives took a similar
path (sort of a stretch). tupac was shot and killed. tyson was never the
same boxer as he once was. interesting structure with comic book stylings
and spoken word interludes. wasn't a huge fan of that to be honest. but
it was an interesting way of telling a story of these two friends who are
both misunderstood, even by their fans. B.
Unmatched
- probably the worst of the 30 for 30 documentaries so far. chris evert
and martina navratilova were in 80 matches against each other and are two
of the best women's tennis players of all time. they basically talked about
their rivalry and tennis for an hour. no other talking heads, no more context
or expansion on their rivalry other than what they talked about. there's
plenty of meat between them for a good documentary, but just seeing them
talking to each other the whole time was boring. it's as if the filmmakers
were going to make a real documentary about these two women and their great
rivalry and got a bunch of interview footage, fell in love with their subjects
and decided to just cut what they had. wasted potential. C-.
07/02/11
Birth
Of Big Air - 30 for 30 that covers the rise/fall of mat hoffman.
he's a guy who basically didn't care about the limits of his body or what
was normally done in the sport. he was about quantum leaps without regard
for practicality or safety. his body has taken some brutal abuse all for
the sport his loves. i'm not sure whether he's a short-sighted idiot without
self-regard or a sort of competitive genius who is pushing the boundaries
of humanity like any great athlete or astronaut (which he is seemingly
equal parts of). B.
Jordan
Rides The Bus - 30 for 30 documentary on mj's first retirement
and stint in minor league baseball. terry francona was his minor league
coach, which is an interesting note. it's mostly interesting, though, because
it's a very rare moment in sports history - a guy at the top of his game,
retires for a couple years to try another sport, and then comes back later
to be dominant again. we see what the sport and team was like without him
(nothing much worthy of note). and when he returns he's arguably even better
than he was before (a rarity in sports comebacks). could he have won 8
championships instead of 6 if he had played those two years? or was starting
out from the bottom the perfect motivation for a guy who had done so much
already? we'll never know of course, but seeing him work in the minors
and riding the bus and all the rest was an interesting time for anyone
interested in sports at the time and the documentary captures it well enough.
B.
Legally
Blonde - not a bad comedy on the whole. turns the expectations
of the viewer on their head. basically a remake of my cousin vinny, but
with the emphasis being on marisa tomei this time around. B.
07/01/11
Two
Escobars - another 30 for 30 documentary, this one follows the
rise and fall of columbian soccer on the national scene. its success was
primarily due to the influx of money from drug lords and one of them was
pablo escobar. the other escobar in the title was a great defender who
had a bright future and whose only "own goal" resulted in a critical loss
against the u.s. in the world cup (when columbia was ranked #4 in the world).
that escobar was killed shortly thereafter, probably in part because of
his error. it's a pretty fucked up world and it makes you happy to not
be a citizen of columbia or involved with drug dealers. B.
06/30/11
Dangerous
Minds - not the best of this kind of ghetto education film, but
actually a pretty well done film on the whole. it's tough to direct these
because we know what's gonig to happen and it's kind of a cheesy idea to
begin with. smith, though, does a capable job of directing it and it never
gets overly hackneyed. coolio's "gangster's paradise" begins the film and
may be the best part of the movie. it's a perfect song in its own way and
it fits the film perfectly as well. pfeiffer-fffphf does a solid job. stand
and deliver is still the best film of this kind. B.
Fun
& Fancy Free - lesser disney animated package (compilation)
film. the bongo the bear story didn't do much for me, though the jack and
the beanstalk story was decent enough. didn't like the dinah shore narration
or writing in the bongo sequence. not entirely memorable for me. C.
06/28/11
My
Bodyguard - 1980 matt dillon and adam baldwin film about a kid
who gets picked on too much so he hires a bodyguard. the kid and the bodyguard
are an unusual pairing, but they get along and band together to bring down
dillon and his gang of bullies. it's a coming of age film in some ways,
an odd couple picture in others. it's always stuck out to me as a good
film because chris makepeace and adam baldwin are so good together. baldwin
has a quite strength that he used later in full metal jacket, but this
was his first performance. underrated and appreciated movie. A-.
06/26/11
Pinocchio
- one of the best of the animated disney films. gepetto, jiminy, pinocchio,
honest john, and everyone else are all good characters and well drawn and
realized. it's a classic coming of age morality tale. pinocchio's character
spoke to me as a young kid trying to differentiate right from wrong. the
music is real good too. a definite standout. A.
06/25/11
Tree
Of Life - a really unexceptional film except for the fact that
it's terrence malick and is weird. really, if a nobody had done this with
nobody actors it wouldn't get any attention as a good film. the cinematography
is really good and probably deserves and oscar, but the film is bad other
than that. the dinosaurs, the 2001 stuff, the god stuff, it's just a mess
of a film that reeks of daddy issues and pretension. honestly, i could
have written about 4 different reviews for this movie, but that would require
my caring first. D.
06/24/11
Bad
Teacher - not as good as i had anticipated, but still a funny and
engaging film. cameron diaz is really good as the unscrupulous and unredeemable
eponymous teacher who cares only about herself. there's really nothing
we're supposed to like about her - she's not the lovable loser, she's not
really good at being a teacher, she's just a mean and selfish loser, but
we like her in spite of ourselves because she's cooler than all the insufferable
people around her. the goody two shoes teacher across the hall, the dolphin
loving principal...they're way too good and/or annoying to be liked.
there's no great redemption
in the end. she finds a place where her brutal honesty can do some good
(guidance counselor's office) and she ends up with the most likable guy
in the movie, but there's no great epiphany that knocks you over the head,
she just realizes that the guy with the money who she was chasing throughout
the film, isn't as worthwhile as the fun guy without money. B+.
Super
8 - definitely draws from stand by me, e.t., and other 80s buddy
flicks. the film does its best when the main group of guys is together
being kids and talking shop. the love story and the alien are diversions
or allegory to add depth or interest for a greater audience than 13 year
old boys (or those who still have 13 year old boys inside them). since
i'm one of those, the love story and alien stuff was less interesting to
me. alien encounter films usually don't do it much for me because the end
tends to be unsatisfying. no, for me this film is much more about the kids
and the proximity to, but dichotomy between, the adult world. both worlds
run in parallel with
only occasional crossover. i always liked this about a film like stand
by me. you have these kids on their own, trying to figure things out. on
occasion they have to deal with the adults, but they're mostly on their
own, solving their own problems. they have their own take on the issues
and actually can see, or are privy to, a lot of things that the adults
don't.
it's a nicely shot
picture and the big train crash was a nice spectacle. B+.
06/23/11
Run
Ricky Run - tells the story of ricky williams and his outlook on
life, his nfl career, etc. he's a wacky guy and he squandered a lot of
potential and wasn't a great guy, but in the end it appears as though he's
gotten on track. he's a better father to his multiple kids from multiple
women, he's a better runner again, and he's a better person. B-.
June
17, 1994 - straightforward documentary about the eponymous date
in sports history. it's the day that arnold palmer retired, o.j. went on
his little drive down the freeway, and the knicks and rockets played in
the finals. nothing real special, not a lot of talking heads or context,
just a narrative. B.
Straight
Outta L.A. - ice cube directs this film about gangster rap, the
raiders and how the two have intermixed. interesting documentary that has
more style than many of the others in the 30 for 30 series. the subject
matter is also interesting, and somewhat unfortunate. B.
06/22/11
Guru
Of Go - more the story of paul westhead than lmu or hank gathers,
though it spends a lot of time on those subjects in the course of telling
westhead's story. the lmu stuff is the most interesting to me because it's
the first time i remember actually getting into basketball. i had been
into baseball already with the rise of the bash brothers and the oakland
a's, but basketball hadn't clicked with my until lmu's run after gathers'
death. unlike len bias, gathers died because he didn't take enough drugs.
like len bias, gathers had tremendous potential at the next level and died
too young. bo kimble shooting the free throws left-handed, the cinderella
run to the elite 8...great story here. for westhead it was topped off by
a wnba championship utilizing "the system." he's the only coach to have
a championship at the nba and wnba level. B+.
No
Crossover: The Trial Of Allen Iverson - i've liked allen iverson
at various times in his career. i thought he was misunderstood or that
some of his sideshow stuff was blown out of proportion. however, it's also
undeniable that he's done some things he shouldn't have done and acted
rashly from time to time. this documentary (from steve james of hoop dreams
fame) is about his high school years when he had his first run in with
the law and was convicted of participating in a brawl that was basically
conducted on racial lines (though that may or may not have been the cause
of it).
james attempts to unravel
the story and find some truth while looking at some of the racial tensions
of hampton virginia (hometown of james and allen iverson). he's the perfect
guy to tell the story since he's from the area and he directed perhaps
the best documentary of all-time. this one isn't on that level, but it's
a good story about a lot of different things.
iverson stands in for
inner city youth here. it didn't need to be him, really. for both the whites
and blacks in the community he is emblematic of something much larger.
the blacks tend to rally around him and his story of persecution while
the whites tend to think it's p.c. treatment of a star athlete. they're
both right.
to me, he's a good
guy at his core. i still believe that people misunderstand his drive and
bravado, but he's also a selfish product of his environment. under different
circumstances iverson would have been a role model instead of a cautionary
tale. B+.
06/21/11
Winning
Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks - chronicles the 90s
matchups between the pacers and knicks. they had some good matchups back
then and some epic games. this one does a good job of recounting them.
B.
Melody
Time - not the best disney film, but better than fun and fancy
free (another compilation film). retells a couple tall tales and has some
original stuff as well. i remember parts of this from having watched it
as a young kid, but i counted it as new since it's been a really long time.
B.
06/20/11
Rachel,
Rachel - somewhat artsy film about a small town girl who is coming
of age. has style and substance, but didn't really grab me. does a good
job of capturing what it's like growing up as a reclusive woman in a small
town and having a repressed sexuality and personality in general. definitely
captures a certain feeling and was successful in that way. paul newman
directs his wife here so it's interesting for that reason as well. B.
Nevada
Smith - good, not great steve mcqueen western about a guy who is
hunting down the people who murdered his mom and dad. there are a hundred
pictures like this, but this one is unique because it takes place over
the course of years, instead of days or weeks. the lengths that mcqueen's
character goes to in order to hunt down each murderer are pretty extensive.
he gets put in prison and escapes with one of the guys responsible for
his parents' murder, just so he can kill him after he's been freed. he
joins a gang and participates in a heist just so he can kill another. pretty
dedicated guy. B.
Naked
Ambition: An R Rated Look At An X Rated Industry - not great documentary
about a mainstream photographer who is covering the avn movie awards. it's
basically him talking about the adult film industry and his photography
career. he likes photography subcultures and remarks on the uniqueness
of the adult film community and how accepting they are. it's a lot of fluff
and nothing very interesting. as stated it is r-rated so it's safe for
most adult audiences. C.
Anvil!
The Story Of Anvil - another documentary about another under-appreciated
music act meets a behind the music/some kind of monster type documentary.
on its surface that's what this is, but it's also about aging and holding
onto the past and relationships. i wasn't especially moved by the story
or the arc it followed, but it was also a bit better than the genre usually
provides. B.
U
- "the u" is the university of miami, specifically referencing the miami
football program. this is another 30 for 30 on the rise and fall of the
miami football program in the 80s and 90s. they produced a glut of nfl
talent but were always marred by rowdy players and bad sportsmanship. their
bad boy persona was definitely earned in my opinion and while one could
point to the upbringing of many of the players or the fact that other programs
wouldn't recruit them as some form of motivation, it just doesn't hold
in my opinion. ultimately a lot of these guys just didn't conduct themselves
properly and the coaching staff was complicit in a lot of ways. they're
the adults, they should have helped raise these guys above where they came
from.
at any rate, it's a
great documentary on a controversial program. A-.
06/19/11
Mission-
good score and cinematograhy, but the subject matter wasn't all that interesting
to me. longer than it needed to be, it's the kind of film that generally
doesn't do it for me, though, so it's not like it was a big disappointment.
C+.
Female
- don't remember much about this because i was nodding off through most
of the middle. basically about a powerful woman who gives it all up for
love. wasn't overly thrilled. there are exceptions, but film didn't really
get rolling for me until the late 30s and early 40s. C.
40
Year Old Virgin - definite classic. A.
Sword
In The Stone - upper-middle level disney flick. nice retelling
of a classic story, i like merlin, nice animation. made at a time of consistency
(peter pan through sword in the stone), but no real greatness. B.
06/18/11
Devil
And Miss Jones - another jean arthur/charles coburn flick. this
time she's a store clerk and he's the richest man in the world. after his
workers threaten to strike he goes undercover and tries to find out who
the troublemakers are. arthur befriends him and he gradually learns what
it's like to be a worker. this is the kind of depression era film that
really shows the contrast between the social attitudes of the 30s/40s and
today. of course there's some romance in the film as well, but somehow
they always manage to make it much more palatable than the dreck we usually
see in films today. there's a particularly good bit of dialogue from arthur
on the subject of love. she's at the beach speaking with coburn (who has
no wife) about the topic and she speaks on it about as well as you're likely
see.
unforunately this isn't
available on dvd and i deleted my copy from tivo. B+.
Quantum
Of Solace - not as good as casino royale, but a good action flick
nonetheless. B-.
Elmer
Gantry - been a while since i've seen this one. reminded me of
a face in the crows this time around. lancaster is perfect for the role
and really nails it. it's a particuarly american film since we seem to
have a unique relationship with religion. from the mormons to the pilgrims
and the abolitionists. watch this and then leap of faith for a good double
feature. B+.
06/17/11
More
The Merrier - good film that takes place in d.c. during the housing
shortages of the 30s/40s. joel mccrea and charles coburn are real good,
but jean arthur is even better. she's always good, though. the three stars
share an apartment and hilarity (and love) ensue. good solid picture that,
like many pictures of the time, encorporates ww2 into the background of
the film. jean arthur and barbara stanwyck are probably my two favorites
of the era. bacall is up there, as is k. hepburn, but arthur and stanwyck
are more consistent for me. even in bad films, they are good and worth
watching. B+.
06/16/11
Midnight
In Paris - takes the simple and unprofound idea that we wish to
be in a different time/place when our lives aren't what we had hoped for.
in this case it's owen wilson who wishes he was alive during the 20s amongst
the literary and artistic heavyweights of the time. eventually he realizes
that everyone thinks the grass is greener on the other side at some point.
it's a simple idea that isn't really fleshed out in any revelatory fashion.
so, the rest of the film is about the characters and the jokes and neither
of those were anything special. there are some literary and art references,
but since i couldn't tell you a damn thing about the private lives of hemingway
or djuna barnes or zelda fitzgerald, i guess i missed much of the comedy.
that said, not a lot of people around me were really laughing that much
either so i don't think anyone found the movie to be hilarious.
one character makes
the observation that we wish to be in a different time because of feelings
we have about the present, but he's a pretentious butt of jokes, so is
allen romanticizing the very idea of being a romantic? the ending surely
would seem to bolster that view. i don't know. overrated. C.
06/15/11
AristoCats
- nothing really worthy of note from this one. uses a lot of the same talent
as was used on other disney films of the time - eva gabor, phill harris,
sterling holloway and director wolfgang reitherman. the story left something
to be desired, though, as did much of the animation. i think i actually
prefer the fairly basic animation of dumbo, aladdin and cinderella. there's
a simplicity in their faces that works better than the more complex or
artsy stuff. C.
06/11/11
Band
That Wouldn't Die - bought the 30 for 30 (50 minute short films
on different sports stories) boxset from espn and here are the first five
i saw... this one is the story of the baltimore colts band. the band symbolizes
the city and their desire to have a team after theirs was taken from them
in the middle of the night. that is actually the more interesting story
so i'm not sure why they didn't tell it. C+.
Small
Potatoes: Who Killed the USFL? -
tells the story of the usfl which briefly tried to compete against the
nfl. they didn't do so hot in part because donald trump was involved and
wanted to use the usfl as a springboard to nfl ownership, rather than actually
make the usfl a competing force. it's interesting from an nfl history standpoint,
a legal one, and a business one. good film that ends with trump looking
like a douche. big surprise. B.
Muhammad
and Larry - interviews and footage of the training before ali fought
larry holmes (his penultimate fight i believe). it's shocking that people
let the fight go as long as it did or that it ever happened in the first
place. you look at the guy and he looks like a mess, even when training.
(what the documentary didn't cover is that the ref was richard green. he's
the same guy who let duk koo kim get literally killed in the ring 2 years
after this fight). when foreman came back in his 40s, he was big and certainly
not in great shape, but he was still relatively spry. ali is relatively
dim-witted at this point in his life, yet those around him looked the other
way. people are real good at convincing themselves everything is ok and
looking the other way. call them an enabler or whatever and they'll get
all defensive. rationality doesn't work with some people. hopefully i surround
myself with people of better moral character and judgment than ali did.
you should think about doing the same in your life. or you could just repeat
the mistakes of others and try to reinvent the wheel. it's your grave.
B.
Without
Bias - every generation needs a story like this - local boy makes
good only to ruin it for himself at too young an age. the positive spin
is that people learn from his well-publicized mistake and downfall (len
bias was a great basketball player who ODed on cocaine shortly after being
drafted #2 by the champion celtics). the result is that his one death saves
the lives of many others who choose not to turn to a life of drugs because
they saw what it did to their hero. some are smart enough to learn from
the mistakes of others. unfortunately, most people are egotistical, solipsistic,
hubristic lemmings who insist on making their own mistakes. have fun, morons.
B.
Legend
Of Jimmy The Greek - i had heard of jimmy the greek, but i didn't
really know who he was until i watched this 30 for 30 episode. it's another
classic downfall story. working class, street smart guy says some dumb
racist shit and gets canned as a result. people blow this kind of thing
out of proportion. happened to howard cosell, too. that's because we're
a country full of morons who can't be bothered to apply decent judgment
or historical analysis to any given situation. yippee. B.
06/10/11
Rescuers
Down Under - not as good as the original and that wasn't my favorite
to begin. didn't like the animation style. liked the selection of george
c. scott as the voice of the bad guy. pretty simple setup, not a lot to
it. C+.
06/08/11
Something
For The Boys - it's like a marx brothers musical meets a ww2 mr.
blandings builds his dream house. i think it's the first carmen miranda
film i've seen and i wasn't overly impressed. like a lot of musicals this
one has a plot that is just a vehicle for the songs. this one barely registered
in my brain to be honest. C-.
06/06/11
Fast
Five - i think i saw number 1, 2, and 4 of this series. 4 was awful
and turned me off of the idea of watching this installment, but meryl insisted
so i went along with it. as weird as it is to say, this film actually had
a tender side and was much more human than i expected. there's a budding
family and an intimacy that the gang has that makes you feel like maybe
spending time watching all these characters wasn't such a waste after all.
of course it's also a great showcase for the talents of all the stunt people
and coordinators who dream up some of the more wacky stunts you're likely
to see. it's a fun film with some good tongue in cheek humor to tide you
over between action scenes. B.
X-Men:
First Class - this is the film that they should have started the
x-men series with. not only because it's the first in the story chronologically,
but also because it made me want to see what happened to the characters
in the future, more than the future films made me want to know what happened
in their pasts. i don't remember much from the other films. it's been 10+
years since i saw the first one so i kept thinking that patrick stewart's
character was ian mckellen's and i couldn't remember that ian mckellen
was even in it. anyway, even with my poor memory for the characters you
can watch the film and have a good time and some of the film will make
you remember elements from the other films.
thought they put together
a good cast on the whole, though one or two characters were superfluous.
speaking of superfluous, there could have been 10-15 minutes cut from the
film. vaughn directs another good one here. B.
06/04/11
Mean
Girls - good film about women and growing up and rumors and cliques
and appearance and a lot of other things. it's ripe material for tina fey's
point of view and everyone involved does a good enough job in their roles.
amanda seyfried isn't the best actress in the world, but she plays a bit
off character and even does a good job here. it's kind of a modern classic
for girls and for good reason. missed the first part because i was watching
it on cable. B+.
06/03/11
Life
As We Know It - predictable and unimpressive rom-com. i like heigl,
but she tends to waste her talent on tv sitcoms and films with little content
or poor execution. duhamel is barely good enough and the only supporting
actor of note is melissa mccarthy who was also really good in bridesmaids.
this is the kind of film that is all conceit and nothing else. it works
well in the 2 minutes that the producer gives you to pitch your film idea
while you're walking with him to his next meeting. unfortunately that's
all it is - a nice setup with little after that. of course it gets hackneyed
because it can't do much else other than to rely on the usual formula.
then again, you're probably not expecting much if you're watching this
film so you're not going to be disappointed either. C-.
06/01/11
Sleeping
Beauty - not bad, not great. more of it occurs before she falls
asleep than i had recalled. B.
05/30/11
Jungle
Book - mowgli (voiced by the director's son) is the best-anmated
character i can think of in the disney catalog. he's drawn simply, but
so smile-inducing it's crazy. the rest of the film is also quite good.
there are a couple good songs and the supporting characters are pretty
good, especially louis prima's king louie and baloo the bear. also you
gotta like george sanders' voice work as shere khan. this is one of the
better disney animated films.
A-.
05/26/11
Hangover
Part II - they tried to go bigger here and up the stakes. to me
it didn't work as well as the first one did because it felt more like one-upmanship
than about the unraveling of an outrageous night. bradley cooper wasn't
on his game as much here, but ed helms picked up the slack with a better
than expected performance. zach galif... did a fine job with what he was
given. ultimately the writing wasn't as good here as it was on the first
one. of course, they stuck with the formula so you're not going to have
a bad time watching the film, just don't expect the classic that the first
one was. the music, the interludes, the writing, the suspense at the end
were all a full notch below the original.
edit 5/31/11: it's
reminiscent of those old noirs where the guy/girl wakes up after a bender
and thinks s/he killed someone (black angel and blue gardenia). then the
whole movie is about retracing everything to see what happened. it's also
like the sequels to the saw movies which all had diminishing returns, at
least in part because we knew that the end would throw a curve at us. like
godfather 2, this sequel has a familiar plot arc, but more conceit than
plot. it also lacks the depth of character that the great sequels have;
and, yes, i count rocky 2 in amongst them. B.
05/25/11
Lady
And The Tramp - better than i remembered. peggy lee is good as
lady and lady is well-animated, as is the tramp. these disney movies do
about as much for animal rights and pet ownership as peta would ever hope
to do. storyline is a bit thin and the ending with the rat is anticlimactic.
storyline is really the same as toy story 3 in a way - the pets get discarded
because the owners have a baby vs. the toys get discarded because the kid
grows up. assigning those feelings of neglect and abandonment to toys/pets.
B+.
05/24/11
Thor-
two natalie portman movies in two days. this one was far inferior and pretty
uninteresting. branah was a weird choice for director and didn't seem to
bring much to the film, except maybe he helped with the antiquated language
used by thor? largely uninteresting and by the book film that didn't need
to be made and certainly didn't need to be in 3d. C-.
05/23/11
Hesher-
great little film that reminded me most of mary poppins. now if you see
the film, don't see it because of that comparison. it's not at all a mary
poppins/disney type film. but the eponymous character is the type who comes
into the lives of the other characters, changes everything, and then leaves
as mysteriously as he arrived. it's a heavy metal version of mary poppins
for the new generation, without the musical interludes. it's also yet another
joseph gordon-levitt film that is up for film of the year. though it was
first released in 2010 at a couple film festivals, it's basically a 2011
film. in both 2009 and 2010 JGL was in my top film of the year. i guess
i have to consider him one of my favorite actors at this point. he's got
great range (brick, 500 days of summer, inception and hesher) and he picks
them as well as anyone else these days. his stuff is must-see material
at this point.
hesher is a great film
about love and loss and coming of age and bullying and depression, but
it's told in such a wonderfully disarming and human way that you can't
help but laugh and be moved as well. it seemed that most of the people
in the theater didn't quite know that they were allowed to laugh until
30 minutes in, but as soon as the hesher film title came up (after a sullen
opening) and it's "hesher" with the "h" and the "r" done like the lightning
bolts in metallica's logo and a quick burst of "battery" accompanies it...i
knew this was going to be an interesting film. in those first few minutes
susser shows us a depressing moment, gives a nod to e.t. (the film also
takes place in the mid-late 80s), and then gives us a wink with the title
card. brilliant stuff.
i don't want to get
too far into the film, but it has some great symbolism and parables that
make it even better than just an immensely entertaining film. watch it.
good
trailer. B+.
05/20/11
Made
For Each Other - there's a reason they call 1939 the best year
in hollywood history. because even after you get through the obvious greats
like mr. smith goes to washington, wizard of oz, goodbye mr. chips, and
gone with the wind there are less well known gems like beau geste, and
two from jimmy stewart - destry rides again and made for each other. this
one is about young love and the first couple years of marriage. it's a
coming of age story for a couple and for a family. it has a capra-esque
feel though it was directed by john cromwell, who has done some good films
of his own. nice film worth checking out to fans of the era or capra fans
looking to see something similar. B+.
05/18/11
Aladdin
- one of my favorites. i think this one actually may be better than beauty
and the beast. a couple songs from that were better, but overall the songs
in this one may have been better. robin williams also helps and aladdin
is more likable than the beast. though jafar isn't as good a villain as
gaston. tough call, maybe it's a draw. at any rate, this is up there and
jasmine is one of the hotter disney beauties. A.
05/17/11
Team
America: World Police - pretty funny, not as good as the south
park movie. the sex scene is classic and you gotta love the jingoistic
parody stuff. B-.
05/16/11
Fantasia
- one of the top animated disney films of all-time. artistically it may
be their best and it's clearly a must see film. several good pieces of
music and plenty of inspired imagery. when it comes to fusion of music
and film there's this and koyaanisqatsi that stand tall above everything
else i can think of right now. A+.
05/15/11
Everything
Must Go - didn't quite do it for me. ferrell is a good actor and
is capable of playing semi-dramatic roles (he nailed it in stranger than
fiction), but only if the screenplay is right. here, i didn't think that
the film every found the right tone. it was waffling between humor and
drama and didn't do it very successfully. some films can toe the line and
go back and forth with ease, but here it felt more like they were unsure
of what the tone was supposed to be. cast does a fine job. ultimately the
writing left something to be desired and the direction didn't save the
material. C+.
05/14/11
Bridesmaids
- funny female version of a judd apatow film. feig's direction left something
to be desired at points. lighting was off or scenes felt flat. on the whole,
though, it is a nice film that feminists seem to like because it shows
female characters can be funny and all the rest. whatever, ask them because
i don't know anymore what we're supposed to be doing to be good people.
B.
edit: i should have
mentioned that rose byrne continues to show good range. here she plays
a stuck up, but funny woman who doesn't ever want to lose. she also played
this year a scared and vulnerable wife in the horror film insidious.
05/07/11
Oliver
And Company - subpar disney animated film. oliver twist is the
basis for the characters, but the plot is different, at least from my memory
of that story. the music and animation are both subpar. one memorable tune,
but not for good reasons. animation is different, but again, not in a good
way. C.
05/06/11
Hanna
- good action-esque film with a good soundtrack from the chemical brothers.
acting is good all around and there's more depth to the characters than
you see from the typical action film these days. the film is partially
a coming-of-age story. has some music video influences that make for a
couple good sequences and a nice stylistic touch to the film. B.
05/05/11
Tillman
Story - documentary that dissects the media response to pat tillman's
death in iraq. everyone knows the story about tillman - left the nfl to
go to iraq after 9/11 and was killed in battle. turns out it was a case
of friendly fire and was covered up by the military. as is typical by those
in power, humanity means nothing to them, they just manipulate the circumstances
to their benefit and move on. later, when the truth comes out, people are
too distracted by other things to get outraged. the initial lie is always
more powerful than the truth that is eventually revealed. if it was revealed
tomorrow that jfk was killed as part of a conspiracy or that 9/11 was an
inside job there would be outrage, but it would be a shadow of the sadness
and anger that followed the initial events and the purported truth of the
early coverage.
the documentary gets
a lot of interview footage from the parents and family of tillman and they
sort of debunk the idea of this macho numbskull football player who was
gung ho about war. he was a patriot, sure, but he read chomsky and didn't
like how the war was going. he didn't fit the typical solider archetype
that was portrayed by the media. seemed to be a thoughtful and relatively
good guy who believed in actual sacrifice and committment. B+.
05/02/11
Great
Mouse Detective - pretty
fun disney animated feature that's really just a sherlock holmes told via
mice. disney has a thing for mice and a thing against cats. maybe walt
was raped by a cat when he was young or something. not sure. B.
04/27/11
Lion
King - really didn't dig the animation on this one. again, the
villain here is the best part and the rest fell flat for me. they just
weren't able to get simba and the rest of the lions to look good in my
opinion. scar, was good and scary and dark, but the good lions weren't
anything special. good musical numbers, but the rest of it wasn't as great
for me as everyone else seems to think it is. frankly, i don't get it.
B.
04/22/11
African
Cats - as a nature film, with the sound off, this works just fine.
i used to watch the old national geographic stuff on tv all the time and
this one has better camerawork than those. however, where those succeeded
and this one failed is in their ability to tell a truthful story about
the circle of life. this one makes it much more of a narrative in human
terms and doesn't have the same objectivity that those had. watching those
early nature films was a good experience. i would watch one following cheetahs
one week and another following zebras the next. of course each time you
root for the protagonists, but it eventually makes you realize that there
are two sides to every story. when you're happy that the cheetah is finally
able to feed her family you then have to remember that the zebra just lost
a member of their family. such is life, but it's a perspective many adults
still don't grasp.
at any rate, the narration
is really where this film suffers. jackson's delivery is adequate, but
the writing is piss poor. C+.
Scream
4 - not a bad way to end the franchise. it has the usual self-referential
stuff and twists and turns. B.
04/21/11
Snow
White And The Seven Dwarfs - groundbreaking and influential this
film also has a nice little story and a couple real good songs. artistically
and technically it's a great achievement for 1937. frankly, looking at
animated films today i don't see 70+ years of evolution. pixar features
use a different method and have gotten better since toy story, but i still
prefer the cel-animated stuff to today's computer-animated features. it
also was one of the early animated works to use rotoscoping which was later
used in everything from films like fire & ice and waking life to the
music video for shadrach by the beastie boys. A.
04/18/11
Cedar
Rapids - funny ed helms picture. it's about a small town insurance
salesman who goes to the big city for a conference and sort of grows up.
john c. reilly and the rest of the supporting cast do a good job. solid
comedy. B.
Fatal
Attraction - iconic film in large part because of glenn close's
character. she defines a type of woman that every man would probably rather
avoid. it's a cautionary tale wrapped in a thriller. unlike unfaithful,
this lyne picture is really well directed, acted and realized. the thriller
portion is much more satisfying and close's character is much more compelling
than anything in unfaithful.
films like this really
strip away the civilized veneer of humans and show us as the monkeys we
can truly be. douglas wants only to get his rocks off and close obsesses
over him, emotionalizing a strictly physical interaction. humans are hilarious.
A.
04/16/11
Fox
And The Hound - hadn't seen this disney film before. it's about
a fox and a hound that grow up together and are good pals until they grow
older and they realize they're supposed to be enemies. the hounds owner
turns him into a hunting dog and it doesn't exactly bode well for their
friendship. it's sad to see them at odds after being so friendly early
on, but it recalls the story of the scorpion and the frog. each animal
is what it is in the world and they shouldn't expect anything different,
sad as that may be. animation isn't particularly good, this one is just
about the story. B.
04/15/11
Naked
Kiss - one of the most seedy noirs you're likely to see. it's outside
the typical noir window (1941-1958), but it has the feel no matter what
you call it. it's about a prostitute who tries to escape her past in a
new town with a new profession. she falls in love and, just when things
are looking their best, they all fall apart. it's this moment that is the
most shocking of the film. liked it more this time around. A-.
04/14/11
East
Of Eden - the bulk of this film wasn't as good as a remember, but
the ending lived up to my memory in every way and then some. at it's core
it's about human interaction and i suppose there are a number of ways of
putting that. it reminds me of the scene from citizen kane where bernstein
says "A fellow will remember a lot of things you wouldn't think he'd remember.
You take me. One day, back in 1896, I was crossing over to Jersey on the
ferry, and as we pulled out, there was another ferry pulling in, and on
it there was a girl waiting to get off. A white dress she had on. She was
carrying a white parasol. I only saw her for one second. She didn't see
me at all, but I'll bet a month hasn't gone by since that I haven't thought
of that girl." it's about longing for human interaction. having more than
the mere superficial human interaction, but having a deep interaction with
a person. cal (james dean) longs for that with his father, but feels constantly
overshadowed by his brother who is a great person by most accounts, but
perhaps not the most aware or curious of souls. that is his weakness of
character, if you will. then there's the father. also a great man of great
morality and high standard, but perhaps too self-sufficient to know what
his own son craves in life - his love. cal, the protagonist, has many weaknesses
- he's perhaps overly curious, awkward socially, impulsive, etc.
really, the first 90%
of the film is about establishing the characters and the interpersonal
dynamics so that the end works, and works well. each character has their
weakness and need and all the pieces sort of shift together in the end.
cal and his father finally finding some understanding thanks to aron's
fiancé mediating and allowing the father to understand what cal
needs and making cal give his dad a shot to do the right thing now that
he knows what that is. isn't that sort of part of the tragedy of the human
condition, though? when viewed from the outside it's very easy to know
what a person needs and where that person is likely going. when i watch
the up series, it's easy, with very limited information, to know a good
deal about the future, desires, thoughts of most of the characters. but
when it's our lives things are so much more difficult to analyze and we
don't see that we're a train on a track towards another train. there's
a trajectory that we create early on and we generally don't change it unless
some really big event occurs or we rise above the pack upon self-reflection
(epiphany) and through hard work, desire, luck, etc. A.
04/13/11
Bad
Behaviour -
barely funny british comedy with stephen rae. barely understood what they
were talking about. speak english! fucking brits. C-.
04/11/11
Stuff
- one of the cool things about growing up in la was that they always had
interesting movies on local tv. the z channel was one thing, but they would
have films like "the stuff" on channel 5 along with old kung-fu films,
etc. it was a really eclectic mix; one that tarantino has talked about
more than a few times. this is one of those weird movies that i was exposed
to 20 years ago on network tv that just never left my head. only saw about
10 minutes of it, but it still stuck. it's a cross between the blob and
soylent green, if soylent green was highly addictive. it's about a mysterious
food product that takes the nation by storm and is seemingly good for you
and great tasting. it turns out that the stuff is actually highly addictive
and has some interesting side effects. fun film that is more 70s in style
and substance than 80s. not sure if it's an allegory about cocaine use
during the time or something else. it's fun to watch though. B.
Peter
Pan - middle of the road disney pic that my sister made me watch
every morning before we went to school for seemingly months. B-.
04/10/11
Unfaithful
- adrian lyne's strength is deviant erotica and it's more of the same here.
it's a pretty standard plot - bored housewife cheats on her husband with
a younger french guy, husband finds out and kills the guy. it's jerry springer,
but told from a different income tax bracket which makes it compelling
to watch, i guess. really, other than diane lane's hotness, there isn't
much keeping this movie afloat. i was mildly interested in the plot
and it's a film that looks good enough, but there's really very little
character development, even the most simple, cliché kind. C-.
04/09/11
Fab
Five - these guys hold a certain place in my life because choosing
them to win it all against unc proved a pivotal moment in my relationship
with my grandfather. we were in hawaii and he was hungry for some action
so he said he'd bet $20 against whatever team i wanted to win the game.
i asked my dad if michigan was a good choice and he said yes so michigan
was my team. in the end webber sort of blew it for michigan despite getting
23 points and 11 rebounds. at one point during the game my grandfather
said "looks like my niggers are doing better than yours." in hindsight
i suppose it was good that i chose michigan and suffered the heartbreak
of that game. if i had chosen unc and won the $20 i may have been too happy
to have properly reflected on that comment.
this documentary covers
a lot of the cultural impact the fab five had and what they represented
in sports and black culture. webber is noticeably absent, but the film
is still excellent without his voice. the fab five were a contrast to the
real powerhouse of the time - duke. they were the ghetto players with the
long shorts and a more freewheeling style of play. duke was about character
and discipline. jalen rose commented that he felt grant hill and others
were uncle toms for going to duke and having good families, but he's reflective
on this point and remarks that it was a feeling he had more because of
jealousy that his own father wasn't in the
picture than anything
else. in this way the story of the fab five is also the story of young
black males in today's society. 56%
of black youth grow up with only one parent, the struggle for identity,
trying to fit in, but also to be an individual.
it also gets to the
elephant in the room when it comes to college athletics - money. chris
webber is one of the most infamous cases of a college kid getting money
while playing for a big time team. he was indicted as a result and the
ncaa moved on to their next victim. meanwhile the system hasn't changed
a lick and the core problem remains that talented kids get no representation
and no slice of the pie they help bake. it's sharecropping.
the film does a really
good job of balancing all the secondary implications and issues that the
fab five were a part of. other than chris webber's absence, it's a really
great film. A-.
04/08/11
Arthur-
a bit better than the original. russell brand is perfectly cast and brings
more of a soft and lovable side to the character than moore did. gerwig
and garner do good jobs as well on opposite ends of the spectrum. script
could have used some tightening in spots. B.
Dumbo
- real good disney animated flick. animation is simple, but emotive. they
kept it simple here going with the separation from the mother and outcast
themes. dumbo's character is a good one and one many of us can relate to
in that we all have trouble fitting in or find ourselves on our own from
time to time. A.
04/07/11
Godfather,
Part II - the bulk of this one isn't as good as the first, but
it ends real well and brings the whole story of the corleone family, and
michael in particular, full circle. nothing is more important to michael
than his family, his male offspring in particular. michael is one of the
most compelling characters in the history of cinema and pacino's performance
here is one of its best as well. A+.
04/06/11
Longest
Day - long film that was reminiscent of gettysburg and toro, toro,
toro. it's essentially a blow by blow account of the d-day invasion told
from the british, american and german points of view. oddly, i found myself
more interested in the scenes following the generals than the foot soldiers.
most of the foot soldiers scenes were pretty average war flick fare. there
was actually too much comic relief for my liking. it seemed to lighten
the film too much given the subject matter. some comic relief in a war
film is fine, but this one had a little too much for me. B-.
04/05/11
Insidious
- good horror flick on the whole, though it fades a bit towards the end.
james wan directed the first saw film, which was really good and helped
define the torture porn subgenre. this one is much more in line with paranormal
activity, though it doesn't have the same realism - this knows it's a movie.
it's a scary flick with effective scares throughout. the last 20-30 minutes
are slower and have some comic relief, which i had mixed feelings about.
good atmosphere, acting was on spot, scary. B+.
04/03/11
Sucker
Punch - high concept story about an abused girl who gets committed
to an insane asylum by her stepdad. she retreats from her reality through
an imaginary world. most of the film is dedicated to one of two levels
of imagination and we only see the real world level at the beginning and
the end.
the three layers go
like this:
women's insane asylum
- all the characters are guards, doctors and patients
brothel/dance club
- all the characters are bartenders, businessmen, and dancers
fight sequences - all
the characters are bad guys of various kinds (robots, demons, etc.) and
good guys (the girls)
it's a cool idea and
a new approach to a genre (prison film) that has been done a million times.
i typically like prison films - shawshank redemption, great escape, one
flew over the cuckoo's nest were/are all on my top 25 at one point. unfortunately,
zach snyder isn't a good storyteller. he's got a great eye and his visual
style and sense of the epic appeal to this generation raised on video games,
but the story and character development are paper thin here and. even.
in the watchmen, which should have been a lot better. the film plays a
lot more like a video game with the familiar structure of story, fight
sequence, story, fight sequence, etc. each fight sequence representing
a level and new challenge. they did an ok job of making the fight sequences
relate in someway to what was happening in the second level of reality.
each fight level had a new song as its theme and they're all performed
by women and, except for one by bjork, were all crappy covers of good songs.
search and destroy, tomorrow never knows, and where is my mind are all
4-5 star songs and were all covered to poor effect here.
lastly, there's the
gender studies questions of the film. it's an interesting film to study
from the gender roles perspective because it's an empowering film on one
hand, but then they're all running around in skimpy skirts most of the
time, too. so is it empowering them through sexuality, or are they empowered
outside of their sexual prowess, while also being sexual (the modern woman
who is both empowered and sexy)? the men are almost all deviants (except,
ironically, for david carradine who is the good guy who sets the stage
before each fight sequence) so there's not much gray area there, but that
happens a lot in these kinds of films - all the white people are evil in
dances with wolves, for example.
on the whole the film
is overly long (in part because snyder is in love with slow motion more
than anyone i've ever seen) and thinly developed from a story/characters
perspective. good idea, poorly executed. snyder should get a new line of
work as a visual consultant and leave the directing to others. C+.
Source
Code - sci-fi film that is almost sullivan's travels-esque in its
conclusion. the final note is a bit more happy than one may like (too hollywood),
but i was fine with it. it's a high concept film that thrills and gets
you thinking. i'm not sure the logic of it works out, but things always
get pretty muddy when you deal with potential time travel and parallel
universes and the like. gyllenhaal is well-cast here. both vera farmiga
(a favorite of mine) and michelle monaghan are also good in limited
but important roles. B+.
Limitless
- good film that is sort of a cross between the matrix and wall street.
deniro is good and has one really nice little scene about still being the
top dog and having a few tricks left to teach the young bucks. it's about
a guy who finds a drug that clears his mind and allows him to use the untapped
80% of his brain that humans don't usually use. nice idea and good execution.
there's more potential to the concept than is realized. B.
Little
Mermaid - one of the better disney films, it has most of the usual
themes and elements. it also has possibly the best soundtrack from beginning
to end. beauty and the beast is also up there, but this one may be a bit
better. ursula is really good as the villain and the supporting characters
(especially scuttle) are good. animation isn't as good here as it is in
beauty and the beast, though it does have some of the more infamous concealed
images. A.
04/01/11
Informer
- reminiscent of m, though not as good. honestly, i'm not sure what it
is about john ford that makes so many people fall in love with him. mclaglen
is good here and the script is nice enough. B.
03/31/11
Multiplicity
- only seen parts of this movie before. michael keaton is actually really
good here as four different versions of the same guy. nice idea, basic
plot, good laughs. B.
03/30/11
Alice
In Wonderland - trippy and creative this version blows the burton
version out of the water. none of the musical numbers are excellent in
my opinion, but it's more about the imagery than anything else. nice flick
that doesn't do much for me beyond the visuals and immense creativity.
B+.
03/28/11
Rebel
Without A Cause - only seen this once before, and it was better
than i remember it being. i think i missed a lot of the 50s subtext the
first time i saw it many years ago. i've seen james dean's three films
where he had any real presence and have ranked them: east of eden, rebel
without a cause, giant. giant is sprawling and never really caught my attention.
east of eden has always been my favorite and rebel without of a cause i
saw as good, but not as amazing as everyone else thought. like i said,
i definitely missed some stuff.
there's so much implied
dysfunctionality here. it's a cross between john hughes and douglas sirk
and is influential to a lot of teen angst and coming of age films, especially
those in the 80s. beautiful to look at and chock full of symbolism. one
of my favorites is when the three teens are making like a family at the
abandoned mansion (symbolic on its own) there is a rocking chair that mineo
rocks with his hand. when we see a wider shot, though, it's revealed that
it's only half of the chair. everything in that place is falling apart
and a shell of what it was or should be. it's one of those great films
like sweet smell of success or sirk's work that shows the seedy underbelly
of a time that is usually portrayed as glossy and pristine. it's easy to
glorify humanity sometimes, but these works show humanity as ultimately
flawed. unlike sweet smell of success, though, magnificent obsession, all
that heave allows, and rebel without a cause all end with an uplifting
and hopeful note. in spite of the oft-hidden frailties and weaknesses of
the species, there are moments of beauty and rebirth. A.
03/27/11
Rescuers
- decent disney pic, but not great. none of the music is memorable. liked
the sketchy animation which is reminiscent of 101 dalmatians. the evil
woman (medusa) character is a cross between cruella and ursula. she even
has two alligators which could very easily have been named flotsam and
jetsam. liked two main characters and medusa well enough, but didn't do
much for me beyond that. B-.
03/26/11
Dances
With Wolves - hadn't seen this one in a while. it surprised me
how humorous it was, something i had evidently forgotten, and it goes a
long way. the three hour run time wasn't too bad on the whole. there have
been 100 minute films that have felt longer. the ending does get a little
preachy and slows a bit. overall, though, this is a solid picture and i
can understand it winning best picture since it's a good film with some
good themes and a nice balance. that said, goodfellas was still robbed.
in two hours scorsese made an even more epic film that i think will age
more gracefully. A-.
03/23/11
Rio
Lobo - i'm not going to say this is the best wayne/hawks collaboration,
but i kinda want to. it really grabs you from the opening scene and doesn't
let go. it's a gold heist that the rebels are performing on the union army.
there are all these nice details that add interest and realism to the picture
(reminiscent of michael mann's "thief" and "heat"). it shows them greasing
the tracks on the uphill portion of the ride so that the train stalls.
then they use a hornets nest to get the guards to jump out of the train
and they slow down the train on the downhill side by stringing ropes across
the track and tying them off to trees. it really appealed to the logistics
side of my brain.
after the heist there
is a hunt on wayne's (a union officer) part to find the informer who ratted
out the location of the gold to the rebels. after the war ends he befriends
two of the soldiers who were part of the heist and they help him find the
turncoat. as he puts it: it was war and you (the rebels) were doing your
job, the guys i'm hunting down were traitors. it's kinda cool to see union
and confederates banding together to fight those who don't have conscience
enough to not stab their own in the back during the war.
jack elam is really
good as the crazy mountain man type who is fighting the good fight and
ends up joining forces with wayne and his buddies. he's in a walter brennan-esque
role here, but more wacky and he does a real good job with it. jennifer
o'neill and sherry lansing are both super hot and have a feisty side to
them that makes them even better. great cast overall. A-.
03/22/11
Resident
Evil: Apocalypse - not an especially good film. mostly just a bunch
of action and nothing in the way of character development or anything else
really. somehow, though, it was watchable and i'd probably watch another
of the sequels if bored and given the chance. C.
03/21/11
Robin
Hood - another in the series of animated disney pictures. not my
favorite of theirs. perfectly adequate, but not especially great. reminiscent
of jungle book which came out six years earlier. liked the greedy prince
john as voiced by peter ustinov. B-.
03/19/11
Karate
Kid, Part II - really doesn't add much to the first film and shouldn't
have been made. that said, it's not a bad film and the characters are still
good so i found it enjoyable. the problem with this film lies with the
fact that it is a sequel to one of the greatest films ever. a film about
hard work and determination, growing up, bullying, being a fish out of
water, finding your first love, the nature of violence and power and many
other basic things. this film doesn't function on that level nearly as
well. there is no epiphany and it's just a film that coasts on the momentum
of the previous work. B-.
03/18/11
Bambi
- one of the better disney films. the backgrounds have a pastoral, painterly
feel to them and the foregrounds are much more lively, but still have a
simple animation style. it's a simple and great story of growing up as
well as the circle of life and man vs. nature. it's dramatized to a certain
extent on that last point, but it humanizes the forest in a way that not
many films do. they don't make em like this anymore. A.
03/17/11
Taking
Lives - wanted to see all of d.j. caruso's films since i've been
mostly happy with his work. this is probably the worst of his films i've
seen (i am number four, eagle eye, two for the money, disturbia, and salton
sea). it's pretty standard fare for the thriller genre. hotshot fbi agent
matched up against sadistic killer. twists and turns, in the end the good
guys win and all is good. jolie isn't much here and ethan hawke has a grating
sort of personality in some of his films. B-.
03/16/11
One
Hundred And One Dalmatians - a couple good songs and a nice story,
but not one of the best animated features from disney. the style of animation
is nice and it's old school enough that it has a sketched look to it. i
liked the faces of cruella and the lead guy. solid, but not as good as
b&b or little mermaid or cinderella. B.
03/14/11
Unknown
- bourne identity type film with liam neeson. would have liked to see more
of the bad ass stuff we saw from him in 'taken,' but that only really comes
up late in the film. the rest of the time he's giving us a tour of the
city and questioning himself and others. it's about identity and memory
and morality and the rest. when he gets hit on the head it's as if his
morality is reset. an interesting philosophical question. B.
Battle:
Los Angeles - not awful, but not good. it's independence day and
war of the worlds on the ground level following only one platoon of marines
who are fighting the aliens on the front line. there's nothing here that
you haven't seen already and it's mostly fairly cliché. there wasn't
a martyr in the end, though, which was an expectation of mine. eckhart
has done much better in his career and takes a step back with this one.
C-.
03/13/11
Adjustment
Bureau - pretty good high concept thriller that could have been
a lot more. i wish it had been about 20 minutes longer and explored the
philosophy of the conceit more. blunt and damon had pretty good chemistry.
overall i think the film could have used a little bit better direction
with more exploration of a couple of the characters. when i rewatched a
couple scenes they didn't thrill as much as the first time around. B.
Beauty
And The Beast - doing a disney marathon over the next couple weeks.
this is one of the best of the animated features from disney. animation
is solid, good story, great songs, and gaston is a great villain. A.
03/09/11
Cinderella
- possibly the best of the disney animated features. it has all the usual
elements with the animal characters, the down-to-earth girl who becomes
a princess, the evil stepmother, an evil cat, etc. animation is more simple,
but there's also something to be said for that style. simpsons features
animation that is about as basic as possible, but you can still get plenty
of emotion with a few lines on the face and there's still plenty of room
for story and character. tight storytelling. A.
Enchanted
- pretty good rehash of the disney princess stories that has fun with the
genre while introducing it to a new generation. amy adams is really good
in the role as the princess. the rest was more referentially interesting
to me than it was anything else. B.
03/07/11
Gasland
- didn't like the narration of the film, but it's otherwise a nice look
at hydraulic fracturing and the health/environmental problems that go with
it. it would at least be nice to know how much of a problem this is so
we can figure it in the calculus of natural gas vs. oil vs. coal vs. nuclear
vs. solar. B.
Godfather
- excellent film on all fronts. michael is the loved son who gets caught
up in the family drama. sonny is well-intentioned (for the family at least),
but a hothead and not particularly good at being a don. fredo is fredo.
tom is smart, but ultimately on the outside of the family in spite of what
people may say about him being part of the family. i feel like tom from
time to time because i'll never be part of the club with some friends or
family. it's a sad place to be and his character has a quiet, lonesome
sadness. the end of godfather II is perhaps better than the end of this
one because we are reminded of michael's tragic character arc.
coppola's direction
is about storytelling more than flash or anything else. the look is iconic
and the acting, writing and score are uniformly great, but the storytelling
is where coppola shines. it's such a well-balanced and well-told film that
even 3 hours goes by quickly. one of the best. A+.
03/06/11
Freaks
- thin on plot this short feature film is notorious for being possibly
the first exploitation film. as the title indicates it's about circus freaks
and the film is basically just about giving them screen time. i wasn't
particularly impressed by the filmmaking nor was i shocked by the exploitation,
but i maybe less than sensitive because i've grown up with the internet.
seminal film, but not altogether great. B-.
03/05/11
Aviator
- scorsese's best picture since casino and it should have been the one
to get him an academy, but people fell in love with million dollar baby
instead. it won 5 oscars that year, but also lost 6. millions dollar baby
was a good film, but not as good as this fast moving epic. of course, they
made up for it two years later and gave him the oscar for the departed.
it's an epic film in
scope. it touches on aviation and film history while telling a human story
about an enigmatic entrepreneur (howard hughes). it features many good/great
supporting roles from the likes of alan alda, alec baldwin, cate blanchett
and others. scorsese continues to move the camera well here and the colors
are excellent. it was also nominated for its sound mixing and dicaprio's
performance, but both lost to ray. ray was a good enough film and jamie
foxx did a good job, though i don't see that film standing up like this
one will. this and miracle are my favorites from the year. A.
03/04/11
Wings
Of Desire - really dense and very german film. it's serious and
reflective and reminscent of some bergman stuff both in look and content.
there's a lot there to think about which means it would probably hold up
fairly well to multiple viewings. it's a bit on the slow side for me, but
not as bad as you might think considering how much actually happens (not
much). it made it to a couple different top
ten lists from members of the family so that's why i finally got around
to watching it. B+.
Jaws
- great thriller/horror film. felt like the mid-point between the birds
and predator. the captain makes one of the best entrances in film history
with the nails on the chalkboard. hadn't seen it in a long long time. good
stuff here. A.
03/03/11
Pete's
Dragon - didn't like this disney effort nearly as much as their
animated film. it's too long and the musical numbers didn't really grab
me. the story is a nice enough one. the dragon is sort of a representation
of the child's id as well as his aimless wandering. in the end he gets
a family and discards the childish things and the dragon leaves. it's a
bit like mary poppins in this way. mary poppins comes along to set the
kids straight and when they're ok, she moves onto the next kids. perhaps
they were trying to tap into the success of that film here, but it didn't
work nearly as well here. C.
02/28/11
Heaven
Can Wait - good film about male-female relations, love, regret,
etc. i liked that it was set on an opulent backdrop with very well-to-do
people, yet they had very common insecurities or problems with jealousy
or regret. in a way i suppose it is a soap opera, but one that is well
done and humanistic. even though it deals with these heavy topics it's
basically a comedy at its core, as any film about life should be. B+.
02/25/11
Eagle
- i'm not a fan of period films in general and ones revolving around honor
and military men in ancient rome are sometimes even less appealing than
the latest bronte adaptation. it's essentially a buddy film about two guys
who shouldn't be buddies. it's your typical setup in a lot of ways, but
with a different backdrop and little (if any) sense of humor. ultimately
it sags under the weight of cliché, a bad lead (tatum) and too much
action that doesn't do anything. C.
Hall
Pass - this is the only farrelly brothers film i can think of where
the leads already have a wife/girlfriend. however, in true farrelly brothers
fashion, the leads are still on the prowl. it's also a more mature farrelly
brothers film. now, don't get too down - you're still going to see a fair
share of shit and dick gags, but the overall themes of the picture are
more grown-up than they have been in the past.
this time around the
farrelly's have two leads who already have a wife and family and are grappling
with the erosion of their freedom and feelings of regret that life is changing.
they're not college guys anymore chasing tail and having fun. it's a realization
all (reasonable) men must deal with at some point. we may continue to fetishize
the hugh hefner lifestyle or fantasize about what life would be like without
the old ball and chain, but ultimately we know that we settled down for
a reason. the farrelly brothers get this.
they also get that
it's a two-way street. women can always get action if they want it (though
they may deny it), but ultimately they also settled for a reason. like
us, they have their own insecurities and regrets that go along with or
come with a married lifestyle. hall pass is about shedding these obligations
for a week and what might happen; at least according to the farrelly brothers.
some of us will stray and others will flirt with the idea only to realize
that we're actually pretty happy with what we have. the guys want to plant
their seed and the women want to feel important and loved. men don't understand
women and women don't understand men. it's the ultimate comic dynamic because
we're drawn to each other undeniably, but we don't understand each other
very well either. honestly, it doesn't get much more funny than that. B.
02/24/11
Mechanic
- never saw the original, but i found this one to be a pretty engaging
action film. there's not much beyond the usual action themes of redemption
and honor and revenge, but it's fairly well-executed with a nice little
twist at the end and a good final action sequence. as an actor, ben foster
kinda gets under my skin. jason statham is solid as usual. B.
02/23/11
Just
Go With It - basically the same as any other happy madison production
in the last ten years and that's either a good thing or a bad thing depending
upon how you feel about adam sandler. i happen to think he has a pretty
good formula and he mostly follows it here. he doesn't have his usual snl
friends make cameos here (though kevin nealon does make an appearance,
we don't see david spade or rob schneider). no big losses there. jennifer
aniston is fine and the writing produces some laughs. B-.
Roommate
- subpar remake (essentially) of single white female, this time set on
a college campus. the villain is really underdeveloped and, other than
looking hot, the protagonist doesn't have much going for her either. it's
just a flat film with very little effort expended on character development,
suspense, or even a wild finale. i'll give away the showdown's exciting
ending: the villian finally fights with the protagonist who stabs her in
the back with a utility knife. that's the end. no second wind, nothing.
a utility knife? really? that's like the least lethal construction-related
tool there is. C-.
02/19/11
Other
Guys - just as funny the second time around. will ferrell and adam
mckay are meant for each other and i enjoy their off-the-wall humor. also
love that this one weaves in a story about the average guys and the screwing
of the american people during the latest financial crisis. B+.
02/18/11
I
Am Number Four - better than expected coming-of-age story. it has
a wholesome feel that sometimes added to it and sometimes detracted from
it. you'll notice, for example, that there's only one kiss in the movie
and not much in the way of real bad language. actually, i thought there
was going to be some christian message behind it in the end, but i didn't
find one. dj caruso has done some other pretty good things in the past
too. disturbia was good for the genre, eagle eye was enjoyable. salton
sea is a bit of a cult classic. two for the money wasn't bad. i thought
some of the action scenes were nice enough and the film moved along fairly
well for me. it's definitely derivative of other films, but you're not
likely going into this thinking that you're going to see some original
piece of genius either. B.
02/14/11
Departed
- gets a little less interesting each time i watch it which is unfortunate.
a little slow at times. like shutter island, though, it has a great ending
that helps its cause. one scene that i really liked this time around is
the scene where dicaprio is getting recruited by wahlberg and sheen to
do the undercover work. the camera moves left to right throughout the scene
and scorsese cuts on movement. it has a dizzying effect which is probably
how dicaprio felt being told that he'll never be a cop in the traditional
sense, but he could be useful by acting like a criminal - the very thing
he was trying to escape in the first place. B+.
02/12/11
Shutter
Island - the film drags in a couple different spots, but it's a
nice looking film with a great ending that is right up my alley. not scorsese's
best work, but nice enough to tide us over until he churns out his next
masterpiece. B+.
02/11/11
Social
Network - engaging and engrossing film that is surprising in its
very existence. it's the kind of film that one wouldn't think would get
made in this climate and so quickly, at that. it seems like a lawsuit waiting
to happen, but i don't really know how that crap works since people are
always getting sued for silly shit on the one hand and perfectly reasonable
lawsuits get thrown out on the other.
the cast is uniformly
great and worthy of the nominations they have gotten. the editing is also
a strong point. the choice to tell the story without regard to typical
chronology is a good one and not just a gimmick. it changes how we see
zuckerberg while keeping us interested. if all the litigation stuff was
placed at the end of the picture it would have been a form of catharsis
for the audience, but it may have also dragged the flow of the film to
a slog.
one of the better films
of the year and a sort of historical landmark for the generation. this
time around i was much more involved in the personal relationships and
less caught up in thinking about the effects of facebook on society. good
flick by fincher. B+.
or:
01100101 01101110 01100111
01100001 01100111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100001 01101110
01100100 00100000 01100101 01101110 01100111 01110010 01101111 01110011
01110011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01101001 01101100
01101101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101001
01110011 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110010 01110000 01110010 01101001
01110011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000
01101001 01110100 01110011 00100000 01110110 01100101 01110010 01111001
00100000 01100101 01111000 01101001 01110011 01110100 01100101 01101110
01100011 01100101 00101110 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011
00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101110
01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100110 01101001 01101100
01101101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101111
01101110 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100
01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110
01101011 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000
01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100100 01100101
00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011
00100000 01100011 01101100 01101001 01101101 01100001 01110100 01100101
00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01101111 00100000
01110001 01110101 01101001 01100011 01101011 01101100 01111001 00101100
00100000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100
00101110 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101
01101101 01110011 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101011 01100101 00100000
01100001 00100000 01101100 01100001 01110111 01110011 01110101 01101001
01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101001 01110100 01101001 01101110
01100111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110000
01110000 01100101 01101110 00101100 00100000 01100010 01110101 01110100
00100000 01101001 00100000 01100100 01101111 01101110 00100111 01110100
00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000
00001101 00001010 01101011 01101110 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101000
01101111 01110111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000
01100011 01110010 01100001 01110000 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010
01101011 01110011 00100000 01110011 01101001 01101110 01100011 01100101
00100000 01110000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000
01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 01101100 01110111 01100001
01111001 01110011 00100000 01100111 01100101 01110100 01110100 01101001
01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01110101 01100101 01100100 00100000
01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01110011 01101001 01101100 01101100
01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101111
01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110
01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01100001
01101110 01100100 00100000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01100110 01100101
01100011 01110100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001
01110011 01101111 01101110 01100001 01100010 01101100 01100101 00100000
01101100 01100001 01110111 01110011 01110101 01101001 01110100 01110011
00100000 01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01110010
01101111 01110111 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000
01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101111
01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00101110 00001101 00001010 01110100
01101000 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01110011 01110100 00100000
01101001 01110011 00100000 01110101 01101110 01101001 01100110 01101111
01110010 01101101 01101100 01111001 00100000 01100111 01110010 01100101
01100001 01110100 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110111
01101111 01110010 01110100 01101000 01111001 00100000 01101111 01100110
00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01101101
01101001 01101110 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 01110011
00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01111001 00100000 01101000 01100001
01110110 01100101 00100000 01100111 01101111 01110100 01110100 01100101
01101110 00101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100101
01100100 01101001 01110100 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101001
01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01110011 01101111 00100000 01100001
00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01101111 01101110 01100111 00100000
01110000 01101111 01101001 01101110 01110100 00101110 00100000 01110100
01101000 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101000 01101111 01101001 01100011
01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01100101 01101100
01101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110100
01101111 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000
01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100111 01100001
01110010 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01111001
01110000 01101001 01100011 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100011 01101000
01110010 01101111 01101110 01101111 01101100 01100111 01111001 00100000
01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101111
01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 01100001 01101110
01100100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01101010 01110101
01110011 01110100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01101001 01101101
01101001 01100011 01101011 00101110 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000
01100011 01101000 01100001 01101110 01100111 01100101 01110011 00100000
01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01110111 01100101 00100000 01110011
01100101 01100101 00100000 01111010 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100101
01110010 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100111 00100000 00001101 00001010
01110111 01101000 01101001 01101100 01100101 00100000 01101011 01100101
01100101 01110000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110101 01110011
00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 01100101 01110011
01110100 01100101 01100100 00101110 00100000 01101001 01100110 00100000
01100001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000
01101100 01101001 01110100 01101001 01100111 01100001 01110100 01101001
01101110 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01100110 01100110 00100000
01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01110000 01101100 01100001 01100011
01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000
01100101 00100000 01100101 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110
00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110000 01101001 01100011
01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000
01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01101000 01100001
01110110 01100101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01100101 01101110 00100000
01100001 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 01101101 00100000 01101111
01100110 00100000 01100011 01100001 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110010
01110011 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000
01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110101 01100100 01101001
01100101 01101110 01100011 01100101 00101100 00100000 01100010 01110101
01110100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01111001
00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01100001 01101100
01110011 01101111 00100000 01100100 01110010 01100001 01100111 01100111
01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100110
01101100 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100
01101000 01100101 00100000 01100110 01101001 01101100 01101101 00100000
01110100 01101111 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110011 01101100 01101111
01100111 00101110 00001101 00001010 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000
01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100010
01100101 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01100110 01101001
01101100 01101101 01110011 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100
01101000 01100101 00100000 01111001 01100101 01100001 01110010 00100000
01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110011 01101111
01110010 01110100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01101000 01101001
01110011 01110100 01101111 01110010 01101001 01100011 01100001 01101100
00100000 01101100 01100001 01101110 01100100 01101101 01100001 01110010
01101011 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000
01100101 00100000 01100111 01100101 01101110 01100101 01110010 01100001
01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00101110 00100000 01110100 01101000
01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00100000
01100001 01110010 01101111 01110101 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101001
00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01101101 01110101 01100011
01101000 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101001
01101110 01110110 01101111 01101100 01110110 01100101 01100100 00100000
01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110000
01100101 01110010 01110011 01101111 01101110 01100001 01101100 00100000
01110010 01100101 01101100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110
01110011 01101000 01101001 01110000 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110
01100100 00100000 01101100 01100101 01110011 01110011 00100000 01100011
01100001 01110101 01100111 01101000 01110100 00100000 01110101 01110000
00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110
01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100001 01100010 01101111
01110101 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100101
01100110 01100110 01100101 01100011 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101111
01100110 00100000 01100110 01100001 01100011 01100101 01100010 01101111
01101111 01101011 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110011 01101111
01100011 01101001 01100101 01110100 01111001 00101110 00100000 01100111
01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01100110 01101100 01101001 01100011
01101011 00100000 00001101 00001010 01100010 01111001 00100000 01100110
01101001 01101110 01100011 01101000 01100101 01110010 00101110
01100010 00101011
02/09/11
Parking
Lot Movie - nice enough little documentary about a single parking
lot in a north carolina college town. the film is at least partly about
a certain sort of working class person. the kind of guy who spends a lot
of time reading and/or thinking about things and isn't necessarily concerned
about material wealth. these are the parking attendants and they're all
sorta outcasts and/or slackers when compared to the bar crowd that they
have to deal with every friday/saturday night. they tell stories about
getting stiffed out of $1 by spoiled sorority girls and the like. it does
make you think about parking lots and the position of parking attendant
in a different way, the way you might after seeing a film like dark days,
though to different effect. it's kind of amazing (though not surprising)
to see how some will get in such a tizzy over the smallest amount of money.
a couple times these interactions are caught on camera - a customer complains
about the price or is seemingly indignant about the idea of paid parking.
some people are really divorced from reality and social mores, in other
words. B.
02/06/11
Fargo
- watched this after writing the review below and found all the comparisons
i made to be accurate. this is the best coen brothers flick there is. if
anyone can give me a good reason that ncfom is better i'm open to hearing
it, but i haven't heard it yet. fargo was first and better. now, big lebowski,
millers crossing, blood simple...those you might have a case for.
strikes the perfect
balance for me and has a much better look and sound than ncfom. visually
only raising arizona and miller's crossing are comparable. don't think
another one of their films has as good a score. this is the one. A+.
02/04/11
No
Country For Old Men - inferior to fargo in every way, but still
a pretty good movie. the actors are all fine, none of them spectacular.
the dynamic between jones and his underling is similar to that of mcdormand
and hers in fargo, but not as funny or charming. they're pretty similar
films in arc, but fargo is more balanced has greater breadth. frankly i
can't see any way to this being the best film the coens made. fargo and
big lebowski will always be better in my estimation. it's not even their
best adaptation of a book. o, brother where art thou and true grit were
both as good or better.
all that aside, ncfom
is another solid pic from two great american filmmakers. they do a good
job of building tension and portraying the pecularities of texas. anton
chigurh is one of the more frightening villains in recent years. didn't
understand the importance of either the opening or closing monologue. i
suppose my biggest problem with the film is the lack of humanity that fargo
has. instead of some rambling dream from tommy lee jones you have frances
mcdormand reflecting on the useless acts of the convict in the back of
her cruiser. instead of a relatively lifeless tommy lee jones you have
a more dynamic and central mcdormand. you see more of her home life and
reuniting with her awkward high school friend. instead of brolin and bardem
you have william h. macy and his father in law and steve buscemi. the characters
and dynamics are much more interesting, fun, and humane. there's a starkness
to this film that just has no pulse. maybe when you're an old man you're
too tired of life to care anymore. maybe that's the point. maybe these
guys are all just going through the motions because they have no drive
anymore. not sure, but i am sure that it's not as fun to watch. B+.
02/01/11
Stand
And Deliver - inspired film about ghetto teacher trying to lift
up kids via math. good and classic film. it proves that high expectations
and hard work are the cornerstones of success, however so is opportunity
and even then it's not always enough (since the test administrators didn't
believe the test results since they came from inner city latinos). in other
words, we need a little bit of the left and a little bit of the right in
order to fix these problems. hopefully people will watch more of these
films and slowly come together. yeah, probably not. B+.
Taken
- top notch bad ass action flick. A-.
01/31/11
What's
Up, Tiger Lily? - like mst3k, but instead of making witty comments
the film is entirely re-worked for (presumably) a different story. of course
the original is some unseen japanese film so it could be the exact same
thing for all we know. it's off the wall satire that allen did in his early
years. these were generally mildly humorous, but not amazing. this one
is one of his worst films. it has a couple laughs, but isn't really entertaining.
the novelty of it is good enough, but not enough to carry the film. only
laughed a couple times. C.
01/29/11
Union
Station - good detective noir. william holden is a tough guy in
charge of security at union station. he gets wind that some shady characters
are using his place to get ransom for a blind girl and he gets on the case.
it goes through the usual plot and ends predictably, but none of that matters
when you have some nice direction and good character acting. the noir genre
formula provides such a solid base that you really only need to have some
good dialogue or an interesting secondary character or two in order to
stand out. this one didn't necessarily stand out, but i was intrigued throughout
and it's a good flick. B.
01/28/11
From
Prada To Nada - pretty bad movie, but not as bad as i was expecting.
i was expecting something marginally better than material girls, but, alas,
i got something slightly better and, therefore, less interesting. through
most of the film i found myself in a sort of stupor - somewhere between
brain dead and mildly entertained. in this way the film was able to make
me sympathize with the main characters like few films are able. for the
duration of the film i felt about as vacant and idiotic as the characters
must have on a daily basis. i doubt that this was the intention of the
filmmakers, but that was my response. perhaps it was a self-defense mechanism
to just shut down mentally while i was watching the film. who knows. C-.
01/26/11
Mr.
Blandings Builds His Dream House - like money pit, this is a comedy
about home renovation. first half hour or so is really hilarious. we get
to know cary grant's character as he makes his way through a typical day
- waking up, brushing his teeth, eating breakfast, going to work. he's
totally put out by life in general and is basically hassled from the moment
he wakes up. it's something we can all relate to on some level. sometimes
it seems that life is setup just to annoy the hell out of us and that's
how it is for him, but to comic effect. eventually he and his wife figure
that getting a house in the country (they currently live in manhattan)
is the answer to all their problems.
as it goes on the film
returns fewer and fewer laughs. it gets a bit bogged down by extraneous
plotlines (jealousy and pressure at work begin to eat away at grant) that
take it into the drama genre a bit. but there has to be a story in there
somewhere so it works for me. myrna loy is good as the matter-of-fact wife
who seemingly always gets her way. good flick. B.
01/22/11
Adam
- good film about a guy with asberger's syndrome. there are a lot interesting
things about asberger's and some things that i find in myself so i found
myself enjoying the eponymous character. of course, it's a movie so things
may turn out unrealistically, but i still found it an interesting window
into the syndrome. B.
01/21/11
No
Strings Attached -
another in a long line of modern romantic comedies in which the couple
is either married or sexually involved before falling in love. as far as
romantic comedies go this one is real solid. i don't like ashton kutcher,
but he does a good job here and i think he knows how to pick roles that
are within his comfort zone. natalie portman is having a breakout year
and this adds to her resume. it's more accessible than black swan, but
there's still some good writing for her character and she shows what can
be done with the genre. this one was also a bit more interesting than most
because the gender roles were reversed. how they did that without tilda
swinton i'll never know. B+.
Company
Men - good film about the economic meltdown. is told from the point
of view of white collar men who are victims of and perpetrators of massive
layoffs. they may not be responsible for the economic meltdown (they're
not bankers or regulators), but they're the kind of guys who certainly
haven't helped the country by looking at the bottom line, stock prices
and shifting jobs overseas. it's good to see it from this point of view
because it's one that i think is easily forgotten in an anti-bourgeois
climate. these are people too and while their economic realities may not
be as stark as most of the rest of country's, it shows that even the well
off are suffering too. tommy lee jones and craig nelson are the only company
men who don't really have anything to worry about from an economic standpoint.
affleck is well off, but not obscenely rich and basically of just above
average intelligence. it's easy to say that he, and the people he represents,
should have tucked away more for the future, but hindsight is 20/20 and
even many of the "best" analysts didn't think things would go the way they
did. also good to see that it showed a couple truths about the recession:
it has affected mostly men and especially the older generation.
one of the best ensemble
casts of the year.
by the film's end i
got the definite feeling that the only thing that's going to get us out
of this is working together again and getting back to the roots of any
economy - production, hard work, honest living. the film is optimistic
about this, but i'm still undecided. B+.
01/20/11
Stone
- kind of a strange film about fate and life and such. i'm not entirely
sure what was trying to be said, but i was fairly entertained along the
way. most of the film i felt that everyone was just sort of off and odd
so i never really got into any of the individual characters. plot and the
meaning thereof is what drove the film for me. when i didn't really know
explicitly what was trying to be said, i was disappointed a bit. perhaps
it's just another film that sorta skirts around a point without every making
one in an easily summarized way. fair enough. B-.
01/19/11
Same
Time, Next Year - neat and simple idea for a movie. it's about
two married people who decide to meet every year in the same place and
have a weekend affair. the movie follows them every 5-6 years and we get
to see how they change and how their relationship evolves. it's a pretty
good film with a lot of dialogue and character study. both actors do a
really good job with the material. however, the first two minutes (which
feature some johnny mathis song) and the last two minutes (which feature
an ill-advised ending) are kinda crap. everything in between is solid.
B.
01/17/11
Dilemma
- starts off slowly, but gets going after 10-15 minutes. frankly, most
of the opening few scenes could probably have been scraped altogether.
it's a vince vaughn movie with the ron howard touch. it's kind of an odd
combination, but it works pretty well on the whole. vaughn disarms and
howard gives us a little of the touchy feely stuff that takes it beyond
the simple comedy.
winona ryder is actually
quite good in a fairly twisted, complex role. kevin james is adequate and
jennifer connelly is solid as always. channing tatum is surprisingly funny
in a nice little supporting role. it's a good rewrite away from being really
solid. B.
01/14/11
Season
Of The Witch - pretty awful film that shouldn't even be considered.
it's not a repulsive piece of trash, but it's not entertaining or interesting
in any meaningful way. D.
Blue
Valentine - didn't expect much from this indie romance, but was
pleasantly surprised. the indie aesthetic hasn't done much for me the last
few years and it was off-putting at first, but i settled into it a bit
and i think the director toned it done as the film went on. i can only
handle all the close-ups and hand-held stuff for so long.
both leads did a good
job, but gosling was probably the better of the two. it's a good film in
the vein of revolutionary road, but in a completely different style. B+
01/13/11
Collapse
- the best errol morris movie i've seen that's not directed by errol morris.
this is directed by chris smith who did the brilliant american movie: the
making of northwestern, but it's done in errol morris' style from stem
to stern; the lighting, the music, the content, the format - everything
reeks of errol morris.
content-wise it's an
interview with one guy about his predictions on the collapse of modern
society. he looks primarily at peak oil and how he thinks it will affect
our economy and society once we reach that point. he's more or less an
alarmist, a chicken little of sorts, but what separates him from the average
alarmist is that he's been right before. he was right about the economic
collapse and its causes, so that lends some creedence to his current predictions.
nothing here is new to the semi-well-informed person. most of us know about
peak oil and the gold standard/fiat currency and the general fragility
of our society. he discounts our ability to come up with new technologies
to get out of problems of scarcity. for example, if we ever figure out
fusion we're going to pretty much set. nuclear isn't great, but if we had
to, we could use it for a large percentage of our energy needs. the biggest
ace in the hole, though, is the population problem, which is an inescapable
one for environmentalists and doomsday-sayers. no matter what we do, the
population of the earth (around 7 billion now) is an enormous problem.
overall, not a bad
film, but the guy came off like a bit too much of a crackpot to take completely
seriously. in the end, maybe we want doomsday to happen because we know
it's going to come for us (death is inevitable). B.
01/05/11
Gold
Diggers Of 1933 - pretty sure this is the first busby berkeley
film i've seen. i'm not much of a musical fan, but this one is real solid.
i guess it works for me as a musical in part because it makes sense within
the film - the three protagonists are all showgirls. it's also good because
outside of the musical aspects the story is fun. it's a prototypical 30s
comedy in a lot of ways. the girls are real sassy and a good time is had
by all. the musical sequences are actually more fun for their visual flair
than anything else, though the music is also good. berkeley clearly had
a good eye for arrangements and how things would play on film. chicago
tried to be a throwback to some of this kind of stuff, but to far less
success to my recollection. B+.
01/02/11
King's
Speech - the biggest problem with this movie is its title. upon
first blush it seems as though it's a film about a specific speech given
by a king. however, you could also read it as the king's way of talking,
which is a more accurate title for the film. either way, it's probably
better to go into the theater with a title like "the unexpected king" which
is far less specific. when you're expecting a movie to be great and you
think it's only about a single speech then it's a pretty high mountain
to climb for the filmmaker.
the film itself is
a pretty solid one. both the main performers were real solid and oscar-worthy.
the most pleasant surprise was the comic relief which balanced the film
quite well. without it the film would have been far too heavy and the characters
too distant and unrelatable to enjoy. B+.
Little
Fockers - loved the first one and liked the second one. this produces
only a few laughs and will probably be the nail in the coffin for the franchise
which is okay by me. everyone pretty much just goes through the motions
and it's clear that there's no real inspiration behind this one. C+.
grading scale:
A+ | 4.3 |
A | 4.0 |
A- | 3.7 |
B+ | 3.3 |
B | 3.0 |
B- | 2.7 |
C+ | 2.3 |
C | 2.0 |
C- | 1.7 |
D+ | 1.3 |
D | 1.0 |
D- | 0.7 |
F+ | 0.3 |
F | 0.0 |
F- | -0.3 |